Generalisation of Polarization identity

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Geometry
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity Polarization
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
Geometry
Messages
6
Reaction score
2
Hello,

If I have a quadratic form ##q## on a ##\mathbb{R}## vectorial space ##E##, its associated bilinear symmetric form ##b## can be deduce by the following formula : ##b(., .) = \frac{q(. + .) - q(.) - q(.)}{2}##. So that, an homogeneous polynomial of degree 2 can be associated to a blinear symmetric form.

Can we generalize this at a k multilinear symmetric form? (I mean associate to an homogeneous polynomial of degree k a k multilinear symmetric form).

Have a nice day.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Their is a a way to developed the formal sum : ##(x_1 + x_2 + ... + x_k)^n## no? It might help but this will create a big sum with a lot of binomial coefficient.
 
Hello,

This is very clear and very adapted for my needs. Thank you very much WWGD.

I wish you a good day.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD