Geometry error: no intersection found in mcnp

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 4K views
khary23
Messages
92
Reaction score
6
Hello All,

I have yet another MCNP question. I received the following error "geometry error: no intersection found mcnp" when trying to run a a simulation. I looked at the output and according to it I have an infinite volume in cells 14 and 500. I plotted the geometry and don't see how its infinite. Can someone help me with what I am missing?
 

Attachments

on Phys.org
Cell 14 is outside of surface 3 (a RCC) and outside of surface 10 (a RCC) and so extends to infinity. Also, it has importance of 1 for p and e. The comment says "outside of problem" so that's weird.
Cell 22 is outside surface 10, a RCC, and it has # on a bunch of cells. So it extends to infinity. More weird.
Cell 500 is outside of surface 4, a SO, so it extends to infinity. It has importance 0.

You've got some messy overlaps going on here.

I think possibly you don't need cell 21.
And cell 22 and cell 200 seem to overlap.

I would suggest resisting using the # operator to define cells. Cell 22 is probably a lot simpler if you just figure out what are the inner and outer surfaces.

When you have different radius at different elevations, it is often simpler to split the cells outside those different radii. So you could split cell 22 into three parts, one above the disk, one extending from top to bottom of the disk, and one below the disk. With three parts you can easily get rid of all the # operators. Not sure if it's still true with MCNP 6.1, but older versions run slower if you have a lot of # operators.

Note that you can use the sub-surfaces of the rcc's to define cells. The top of rcc 40 is surface 40.2, the bottom is 40.3. But the sense is weird. +40.2 is outside the top of the rcc, and so it's the positive coord direction. +40.3 is outside the BOTTOM of the rcc, so it's the NEGATIVE coord direction. So the region -40.2 -40.3 is the region between the top and bottom of the rcc.
 
DEvens said:
Cell 14 is outside of surface 3 (a RCC) and outside of surface 10 (a RCC) and so extends to infinity. Also, it has importance of 1 for p and e. The comment says "outside of problem" so that's weird.
Cell 22 is outside surface 10, a RCC, and it has # on a bunch of cells. So it extends to infinity. More weird.
Cell 500 is outside of surface 4, a SO, so it extends to infinity. It has importance 0.

You've got some messy overlaps going on here.

I think possibly you don't need cell 21.
And cell 22 and cell 200 seem to overlap.

I would suggest resisting using the # operator to define cells. Cell 22 is probably a lot simpler if you just figure out what are the inner and outer surfaces.

When you have different radius at different elevations, it is often simpler to split the cells outside those different radii. So you could split cell 22 into three parts, one above the disk, one extending from top to bottom of the disk, and one below the disk. With three parts you can easily get rid of all the # operators. Not sure if it's still true with MCNP 6.1, but older versions run slower if you have a lot of # operators.

Note that you can use the sub-surfaces of the rcc's to define cells. The top of rcc 40 is surface 40.2, the bottom is 40.3. But the sense is weird. +40.2 is outside the top of the rcc, and so it's the positive coord direction. +40.3 is outside the BOTTOM of the rcc, so it's the NEGATIVE coord direction. So the region -40.2 -40.3 is the region between the top and bottom of the rcc.

Thank you for the explanation!