Getting 1st order ODE's from a 2nd order ODE

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter vohe1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2nd order Ode
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the process of converting a second-order ordinary differential equation (ODE) into a system of first-order ODEs. Participants explore methods to achieve this transformation using given equations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Post 1 presents two equations, a second-order ODE and a relationship involving angular velocity, and asks how to derive three first-order ODEs from them.
  • Post 2 offers a hint to rewrite the first equation in a way that only first-order ODEs are used.
  • Post 3 expresses uncertainty about how to proceed with the hint provided.
  • Post 4 suggests a method based on literature, proposing to define a new set of dependent variables and derive a first-order system. The participant discusses substituting variables to eliminate dependence on θ and presents a potential formulation for the first-order ODEs.
  • Post 5 references an attached page, presumably containing further details or a visual representation related to the discussion, but does not clarify if it meets the expectations set by earlier posts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the method to derive the first-order ODEs, and there are varying levels of confidence and understanding regarding the approach. The discussion remains exploratory and unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about their suggestions and the correctness of their approaches, indicating a reliance on specific mathematical principles and definitions that may not be universally agreed upon.

vohe1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Equations:

(d^2r/dt^2) - r*(dθ/dt)^2 = -10/(r^2)

and

r^2*(dθ/dt)=1

How would I get three 1st order ODE's from this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: How would you rewrite eq. 1 so that only first order ODEs were used?
 
Ok. But how would I go about doing that?
 
I've been struggling with exactly this sort of problem. So bear in mind that I might be mistaken. But maybe it'll help us both if I have a go too and thrash around for an answer, and if my suggestion is wrong, hopefully someone will correct it. I've been reading section 1.2 of Teschl's ODEs & Dynamical Systems. He says that

any system can always be reduced to a fi rst-order system by changing to the new set of dependent variables y = (x,x(1),...,x(k-1)). This yields the new first-order system

y'1 = y

y'k-1 = y(k)

y'k = f(t,y).

So, if I've understood this right, we could let y = (r,r'), so that y' = (r',r''), where r' means dr/dt. Then, following SteamKing's hint and concentrating on the first equation,

y' = (r',-rθ'2-10r-2).

But, hey, from your 2nd equation, we have θ'2 = r-2, so we can substitute for this to get an equation that doesn't depend on θ, like this

y' = (r',-r*r-2-10r-2) = (r',-r-1-10-2).

Then, you could let w = (θ,θ') and use substitution and the chain rule to get an expression for w' in terms of r. Would that be the three equations you're looking for: one for y', one for w' in terms of θ, and one for w' in terms of r? Or maybe the three would be y' and w' in terms of r, and the second of your given equations, rearranged as θ' = r-2; that makes three first order ODEs, doesn't it?
 
See the attached page. Is it that what was expected ?
 

Attachments

  • ODE.JPG
    ODE.JPG
    24 KB · Views: 446

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K