MHB Getting variance from known correlation

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion, participants explore the variance of the sum of two variables, X and Y, that have the same distribution and a correlation of -0.5. They derive that the covariance can be expressed in terms of the variance of X, leading to the conclusion that V[X+Y] equals V[X] when substituting the known values. The importance of the negative correlation is highlighted, indicating that it alters the expected variance outcome compared to uncorrelated variables. Ultimately, the conversation concludes that the calculations confirm the relationship between variance and correlation, emphasizing that the scenario is simpler than initially perceived. The final takeaway is that the negative correlation significantly impacts the variance of the sum of the two variables.
das1
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Suppose X and Y have the same distribution, and Corr(X,Y) = -0.5. Find V[X+Y].

I know that Corr(X,Y)*SD[X]SD[Y] = Cov(X,Y)

and also V[X+Y] = V[X] + V[Y] + 2Cov(X,Y)

So there must be a missing link, maybe an identity, that I'm not realizing. I think the fact that the 2 variables have the same distribution is probably important, I'm just not sure how.

Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
das said:
Suppose X and Y have the same distribution, and Corr(X,Y) = -0.5. Find V[X+Y].

I know that Corr(X,Y)*SD[X]SD[Y] = Cov(X,Y)

and also V[X+Y] = V[X] + V[Y] + 2Cov(X,Y)

So there must be a missing link, maybe an identity, that I'm not realizing. I think the fact that the 2 variables have the same distribution is probably important, I'm just not sure how.

Thanks!

Hey das! (Smile)

Since X and Y have the same distribution, we have that V[Y]=V[X] and SD[Y]=SD[X].
What if you substitute that and combine the equations you already have?
 
Hi thank you!

So substituting that we have something like $$-0.5 = \frac{Cov(X,Y)}{SD[X]^2}$$ and $$V[X+Y] = 2V[X] + 2Cov[X+Y]$$ Wouldn't we still need to know more info, like what Cov(X,Y) is, before solving? And we can't get those without knowing what SD[X] or V[X] are (or SD[Y] or V[Y]). Don't we need one more constant here?
 
Last edited:
OK, did it all out and got
$$\frac{-var(X)}{2} = cov(X,Y)$$
then $$-var(X) = 2cov(X,Y)$$
then $$V[X+Y] = V[X] = V[Y]$$
I was thinking I needed a constant but not sure if that's possible here...is there a way I can actually make this a constant or is this as simple as it can get?
 
Yep. That's it and it is as simple as it can get. (Nod)

Note that if X and Y were uncorrelated, we would have $V[X+Y] = 2V[X]^2$.
Now that X and Y are negative correlated by a factor of $-\frac 1 2$ that factor of $2$ effectively disappears.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top