Goldstein schodinger's equation Lagragian problem.

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Peeter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Goldstein Lagragian
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 3K views
Peeter
Messages
303
Reaction score
3
Problem 3 in the continuous systems and fields chapter of (the first edition, 1956 printing) of Goldstein's classical mechanics has the following Lagrangian:

[tex] L = \frac{h^2}{8 \pi^2 m} \nabla \psi \cdot \nabla \psi^{*}<br /> + V \psi \psi^{*}<br /> + \frac{h}{2\pi i}<br /> ( \psi^{*} \dot{\psi}<br /> - \psi \dot{\psi}^{*} )[/tex]

The problem is to treat [itex]\psi[/itex] and its conjugate as independent field variables and show that this generates Schrödinger's equation and its conjugate.

Doing the problem I find I need [itex]h/4\pi i[/itex] in this last term to make it work out. Could somebody with a newer edition of this text see if this is a corrected typo?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Does anybody see where I went wrong:

[tex] L <br /> = \frac{h^2}{8 \pi^2 m} \nabla \psi \cdot \nabla \psi^{*} + V \psi \psi^{*} + \frac{h}{2 \pi i} ( \psi^{*} \partial_t \psi - \psi \partial_t \psi^{*} )[/tex]
[tex] = \frac{h^2}{8 \pi^2 m} \partial_k \psi \partial_k \psi^{*} + V \psi \psi^{*} + <br /> \frac{h}{2 \pi i} ( \psi^{*} \partial_t \psi - \psi \partial_t \psi^{*} )[/tex]

We have
[tex] \frac{\partial L}{\partial \psi^{*} } = V\psi + \frac{h}{2 \pi i} \partial_t \psi[/tex]

and canonical momenta
[tex] \frac{\partial L}{\partial{(\partial_k \psi^{*})}} = \frac{h^2}{8 \pi^2 m} \partial_{k} \psi[/tex]
[tex] \frac{\partial L}{\partial{(\partial_t \psi^{*})}} = -\frac{h}{2 \pi i} {\psi}[/tex]

[tex] \frac{\partial L}{\partial \psi^{*}} = \sum_k \partial_k \frac{\partial L}{\partial{(\partial_k \psi^{*})}} + \partial_t \frac{\partial L}{\partial{(\partial_t \psi^{*})}}[/tex]
[tex] V\psi + \frac{h}{2 \pi i} \partial_t \psi = \frac{h^2}{8 \pi^2 m} \sum_k \partial_{kk} \psi -\frac{h}{2 \pi i} \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial{t}}[/tex]

which is off by a factor of two in the time term
[tex] -\frac{h^2}{8 \pi^2 m} \nabla^2 \psi + V\psi = \frac{h i}{\pi} \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial{t}}[/tex]
 
Peeter said:
Problem 3 in the continuous systems and fields chapter of (the first edition, 1956 printing) of Goldstein's classical mechanics has the following Lagrangian:

[tex] L = \frac{h^2}{8 \pi^2 m} \nabla \psi \cdot \nabla \psi^{*}<br /> + V \psi \psi^{*}<br /> + \frac{h}{2\pi i}<br /> ( \psi^{*} \dot{\psi}<br /> - \psi \dot{\psi}^{*} )[/tex]

The problem is to treat [itex]\psi[/itex] and its conjugate as independent field variables and show that this generates Schrödinger's equation and its conjugate.

Doing the problem I find I need [itex]h/4\pi i[/itex] in this last term to make it work out. Could somebody with a newer edition of this text see if this is a corrected typo?

You are right. I remember this "typo"! I wonder why it has not been corrected after all these years?
The 1/2 factor is necessary when working with Hermitian Lagrangians like the one you wrote. Non-hermitian Lagrangian on the other hand does not need the 1/2, but does the same job;

[tex]\mathcal{L} = i \hbar \psi^{*}\partial_{t}\psi - \frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m} \partial_{i}\psi^{*}\partial_{i}\psi - V(x) \psi^{*}\psi[/tex]

regards

sam
 
Thanks Sam.

Malawi,

What page and chapter is this problem in, in the third edition?

EDIT: fyi. I reported the problem and got the following response:

> I looked in the 1st, 4th and 6th printings of the 3rd edition. The problem appears on page 599 (#4). The correction you sent was made before the 1st printing since the 1/4 appears on page 599 of all printings.
 
Last edited: