Good Quantum Numbers: Helicity & Invariants

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter touqra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum Quantum number
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Good quantum numbers, such as helicity, are defined by their commutation with the Hamiltonian operator. While helicity serves as a good quantum number for massless particles, it is not invariant for massive particles, as it can change when transitioning between different Lorentz frames. This discussion highlights the importance of measuring good quantum numbers without altering the particle's energy, despite their frame-dependent nature. The conversation also raises questions about the validity of helicity commuting in the quantum Hamiltonian, referencing Dirac's cautionary notes on the subject.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and operators
  • Familiarity with the concept of the Hamiltonian in quantum systems
  • Knowledge of Lorentz transformations and their implications
  • Basic grasp of particle physics, particularly massless versus massive particles
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of good quantum numbers in quantum mechanics
  • Study the role of the Hamiltonian operator in quantum systems
  • Explore the differences between helicity and other quantum numbers
  • Examine Dirac's contributions to quantum mechanics and his warnings regarding helicity
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics and particle physics, as well as students seeking to deepen their understanding of quantum numbers and their applications in various frames of reference.

touqra
Messages
284
Reaction score
0
If an operator commutes with the Hamiltonian, then, the eigenvalues are said to be good quantum numbers. For example, the helicity. But then, helicity is not an invariant for a massive particle. I can always go to another Lorentz frame such that the helicity is now reversed. How then, can it be a good quantum number?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
And, if you did that, the eigenvalue of the Hamiltonian, in general, would also be different; but, this doesn't seem to trouble you.

The point of thinking about "good quantum numbers" isn't that they're the same in all frames. The point is that you can measure them without changing the particle's energy.
 
Hi touqra, I am curious where you read that helicity commutes in the quantum Hamiltonian? (Dirac warns us about that.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K