Good Quantum Numbers: Helicity & Invariants

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter touqra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum Quantum number
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 10K views
touqra
Messages
284
Reaction score
0
If an operator commutes with the Hamiltonian, then, the eigenvalues are said to be good quantum numbers. For example, the helicity. But then, helicity is not an invariant for a massive particle. I can always go to another Lorentz frame such that the helicity is now reversed. How then, can it be a good quantum number?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
And, if you did that, the eigenvalue of the Hamiltonian, in general, would also be different; but, this doesn't seem to trouble you.

The point of thinking about "good quantum numbers" isn't that they're the same in all frames. The point is that you can measure them without changing the particle's energy.
 
Hi touqra, I am curious where you read that helicity commutes in the quantum Hamiltonian? (Dirac warns us about that.)