Good Timekeepers: Arranging Clocks by Relative Value

  • Thread starter Thread starter loisshekinah
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on evaluating the performance of five clocks based on their accuracy relative to the WWV signal at noon. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the rate of gain or loss of each clock rather than their absolute time readings. A clock that consistently loses exactly one minute per hour is deemed more reliable than one that fluctuates within five minutes of the correct time. The concept of standard deviation is introduced as a potential method for assessing the clocks' performance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of timekeeping principles
  • Familiarity with the WWV time signal
  • Basic knowledge of standard deviation
  • Concept of clock accuracy and precision
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for calculating standard deviation in timekeeping
  • Explore the principles of clock accuracy and reliability
  • Learn about the WWV time signal and its applications
  • Investigate different types of clocks and their mechanisms
USEFUL FOR

Anyone involved in timekeeping, including horologists, naval personnel, and engineers focused on precision instruments.

loisshekinah
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
A naval destroyer is testing five clocks. Exactly at noon, as determined by the WWV signal, on the successive days of a week the clocks read as follows.

[Attached Image]

How would you arrange these five clocks in the order of their relative value as good timekeepers? Justify your choice.
 

Attachments

  • Clock.JPG
    Clock.JPG
    43.1 KB · Views: 393
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Heard of standard deviation?
Also rememebr that you don't necessarily care what the time says as long as you know how fast/slow it is from the real time and what the rate is.
A clock that loses EXACTLY 1minute/hour might be better than something which is always within 5mins of the correct time.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
5K
  • · Replies 95 ·
4
Replies
95
Views
8K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
4K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K