Goodness factor for fan cooling performance

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on evaluating the performance of various shroud designs for an axial fan in a wind tunnel setup aimed at enhancing convective cooling. The key metric proposed for performance evaluation is plotting heat transfer characteristics against the power consumed by the fan. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between airflow, pressure drops, and heat transfer rates, noting that while the heat transfer coefficient remains constant, the shroud shapes significantly influence airflow and cooling efficiency.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of convective heat transfer principles
  • Familiarity with axial fan operation and performance metrics
  • Knowledge of fluid dynamics, particularly airflow and pressure drop concepts
  • Experience with experimental design in thermal systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for plotting heat transfer versus airflow in thermal systems
  • Explore the impact of shroud design on airflow dynamics and cooling efficiency
  • Investigate fan power consumption metrics in relation to cooling performance
  • Learn about heat transfer coefficient calculations for different geometries
USEFUL FOR

Engineers and researchers involved in thermal management, HVAC specialists, and anyone designing or optimizing cooling systems using axial fans and shrouds.

gomerpyle
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
I have a set up which is basically a small wind tunnel (single rectangular channel) with an axial fan at the inlet. The experiment is testing the effect of various shaped "shrouds" that constrict flow around an inductor to improve the convective cooling. I have heat transfer coefficients and pressure drops gathered from the different shroud concepts, but I need some sort of measure of performance to evaluate them.

Would plotting HTC versus power consumed by the fan by an effective way to do this? The goal here is to minimize fan power but maximize the heat transfer.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Heat transfer vs flow, not heat transfer coefficient, I would think. It isn't clear to me what exactly you are doing though because heat transfer coefficient should be a constant based on the geometry and properties of what heat is flowing from and adding any restriction should reduce airflow and therefore reduce heat dissipation.
 
russ_watters said:
Heat transfer vs flow, not heat transfer coefficient, I would think. It isn't clear to me what exactly you are doing though because heat transfer coefficient should be a constant based on the geometry and properties of what heat is flowing from and adding any restriction should reduce airflow and therefore reduce heat dissipation.

The shrouds increase the velocity of the air around the inductor because the cross-sectional area is reduced. Each different shroud shape has a different pressure drop associated with it, and different heat transfer characteristics.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
32K