Google, IBM, Rigetti, and IQM all manufacture superconducting quantum computers -- What are the differences?

  • Thread starter Thread starter brianeyes88677
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Superconducting
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
Sign up Log in
4 replies · 5K views
brianeyes88677
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Thread moved from the technical forums to the schoolwork forums
Physics news on Phys.org
brianeyes88677 said:
please analyze and see what is the advancement in the technology
Oh boy, this is PF just a please is not going to cut it out here, please show some effort and provide more details of what you have found.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby, Jobean123, phinds and 1 other person
To me, "manufacture" implies some sort of mass production or production for the end user. That could not be further from the truth. All current quantum computers are very experimental, one-off, devices. They are all experimenting with small devices to see how to proceed toward a practical device. They all differ in significant ways. Although they are small, they are as large as the current technology allows. The users are also experimenting with how to use them.
 
Last edited:
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DeBangis21 and pines-demon
Thread has been moved to the schoolwork forums and is reopened provisionally.

@brianeyes88677 -- You need to show some effort in order to get help with schoolwork-type questions at PF.