Where did I go wrong in finding the length x using the grabber-statics example?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the calculation of length x in the context of a grabber-statics example. The user initially attempted to derive length x using two moment equations but encountered an error in their calculations. They concluded that the frictional force balances the weight of the box and emphasized the importance of the normal force in generating friction through torque applied by the grabber. The final solution was confirmed as correct.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static equilibrium principles
  • Familiarity with moment equations in physics
  • Knowledge of frictional forces and normal force interactions
  • Basic grasp of torque and its applications in mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study static equilibrium in mechanical systems
  • Learn about calculating moments and torques in physics
  • Research the relationship between frictional force and normal force
  • Explore practical applications of grabber mechanisms in engineering
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mechanical engineering, physics enthusiasts, and anyone involved in the design and analysis of static systems and grabber mechanisms.

mrshlnnxfa
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

We should get the length x , when the grabber can just hold the box.

yTBz.png


I made two moment equations:

e[czech]{babel}%20M_{1}=\frac{G}{2\mu%20}*\sqrt{(l_{1}+l_{2})^{2}+(\frac{b}{2})^{2}}\end{align*}.gif


yle\begin{align*}\usepackage[czech]{babel}%20M_{2}=\frac{G}{2}*\sin%20\alpha%20*%20x\end{align*}.gif


Then I put them together into one equation:
mathtex.gif


And from that equation I found out x:
mathtex.gif
Unfortunately the result seems to be wrong. Can you please help me? Where I made the mistake?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
i think the frictional force balance the wight of the box.we have to give the normal force on the box that give rise to the friction by giving a torque to the grabber
 
I finally got it. Here is the solution.

Ehpw.png
 
Yes,that is the correct answer:smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K