Graph with Saul and Perlmutter's results

  • Thread starter Niles
  • Start date
  • #1
Niles
1,868
0
Hi guys

Please take a look at this familiar graph: http://www.iop.org/EJ/article/1538-3881/116/3/1009/980111.fg7.html

I've read about how the data got conceived and all, but I can't see why that graph indicates that [tex]\Omega_m=0.3[/tex] and [tex]\Omega_\Lambda=0.7[/tex]? :confused:
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
mathman
Science Advisor
8,084
550
This is the point where the major axis of the inner solid ellipse crosses the line representing total omega = 1.
 
  • #3
Wallace
Science Advisor
1,256
0
Is the confusion due to the fact that the ellipse is actually centered on something crazy, like (0.9,1.5) rather than the (0.3,0.7) you expected? As mathman pointed out, the key point is that (0.3,0.7) is where the ellipse crosses total omega=1.

The reason that this is important however is because of the rest of the data. The SN alone leave you with the large ellipse, but have a look at http://snap.lbl.gov/images/omlam.jpg" figure. It shows the way three important data sets, SN, the CMB and galaxy cluster constrain the parameters. As can be see, the CMB basically tells you that omega=1, but doesn't say what the breakup of that is, the SN tell you that the break up is (0.3,0.7) if omega=1 and the clusters tell you independently that omega matter =0.3.

It is the fact that these and other data sets agree independantly, i.e. the contours all cross at a point, that we call this the concordance model. This figure is from the SuperNovae Acceleration Probe (SNAP) website. This is a planned space mission to study dark energy. Note the tiny region they hope to constrain the parameters to!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Suggested for: Graph with Saul and Perlmutter's results

Replies
21
Views
822
Replies
0
Views
390
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
808
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
382
  • Last Post
Replies
24
Views
541
Replies
5
Views
549
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
570
Replies
34
Views
2K
Top