Gravatational Potential Energy

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around gravitational potential energy and the mass of a satellite orbiting Earth. The original poster is tasked with finding the mass of a satellite using the gravitational potential energy and the gravitational force, while grappling with the absence of a radius in the equations provided.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between gravitational force and potential energy, questioning how to express the radius in terms of mass and other known quantities. There is an attempt to manipulate equations to isolate the mass of the satellite.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing various equations and attempting to derive relationships between the variables. Some guidance has been offered regarding combining equations and isolating terms, though there is no explicit consensus on the final form of the solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note constraints such as the requirement to avoid using the radius in the final answer and the challenge of working with multiple variables that are interdependent.

Lemmy
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Okay I understand somewhat of this topic of grav potential energy but i got stumped on this one question. I am to find the mass of a satellite orbiting Earth with the given variables of (F)(units: kN) which is the force the sattelite attracts the earth, and given the gravitational potential energy (-U). You are also givin the gravitational constant (G), and the Earth (m_e)

How could you find the mass (m) of the sattelite without a given radius in the equation U=-(G*m_e*m)/r ?

How would i rewrite this equation

i know if i was givin radius then i could write it as m=(U*r)/-(G*m_e)

any help would be great thanks
lemmy

here is the problem
"When in orbit, a communication satellite attracts the Earth with a force of F and the earth-satellite gravitational potential energy (relative to zero at infinite separation) is - U"
"Find the mass of the satellite."
"Take the gravitational constant to be G , the mass of the Earth to be m_e ."
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmmm maybe F=(G*m*m_e)/r^2, i could possibly do r^2=(G*m*m_e)/F then r=sqrt((G*m*m_e)/F)
u think that's how to do radius?
 
tell me if this sounds right, m=(U*sqrt((G*m*m_e)/F))/(G*m_e)
aww nm i don't know m :(
 
Hi again Lemmy, please don't post multiple copies of the same question in different forums, thanks!

Regarding your work so far, you have found a formula for the radius in terms of the unknown mass and known quantities (m_e, G, F). Can you now find another formula that relates m and r so that you can plug in and solve for m?
 
well U= -(G*m_e*m)/(r) and F=-(G*m_e*m)/r^2 is all that comes to mind right now
 
Lemmy, you keep going in circles. I can't just tell you the answer, but it is staring you right in face. Think about what equations you have used already and what equations you haven't used yet. Hint: you know r in terms of m, so look back at your first post.
 
what do you mean i know r in terms of m? and i still don't understand where for would apply,tricky part is I'm not allowed to have r in my answer
 
Last edited:
i'm trying to find the equation to solve this problem
 
Lemmy, in post number 2 you give a formula for radius r in terms of mass m, G, m_e, and F. This formula came from the force equation. In post one you give a formula for mass m in terms of radius r, G, m_e, and U. This formula came from the potential energy equation. Can you somehow combine the two?

Edit: Look at post 3, you've already done it!
 
  • #10
m=(U*sqrt((G*m*m_e)/F))/(G*m_e)
thats not it because i can't use m in the (U*sqrt((G*m*m_e)/F)) because m is not given in both equations they both involve m and r, and both m and r are not given in both equations, so i can't use what i posted in the third post
 
  • #11
hehe i tried submitting the third post answer and its wrong :(
 
  • #12
Lemmy, you have one equation there involving only m, you can solve it for m in terms of just G, m_e, F, and U.

Let me write it for you:
<br /> m = \frac{U \sqrt{G m_e m}}{\sqrt{F}}\frac{1}{G m_e},<br />
can you see how to find m?
 
Last edited:
  • #13
shouldn't the (U*sqrt((G*m_e*m)/F))) all be in the numerator?
 
  • #14
Yes, sorry, I fixed it. Can you solve that for m? Hint: get all the m terms on one side.
 
  • #16
thing is physics monkey i can't change the left side term, because the problem has everything set to m= already and i can't change left, only answer i can submit is the right term
 
  • #17
Yes you can, Lemmy. That's how solving equations works. Maybe what you end up with is \sqrt{m} equals something you know, so then you just take the square of both sides to find what m equals.
 
  • #18
oh hmm i see, okay i'll try it, my algebra skills suck though
 
  • #19
okay i solved and got m=(U^2)/(F*G*m_e)
can you check my algebra? i hope this is right *crosses fingers*
 
  • #20
Looks fine to me.
 
  • #21
okay going to give this a whirl thank you soo much for your help physics monkey, greatly appreciated
 
  • #22
woooo got it right thanks physics monkey
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
546