Gravitational Attraction, Electromagnetic Radiation and Dark Matter

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion explores the gravitational effects of electromagnetic (EM) radiation, specifically its potential to exert a gravitational attraction due to its energy. The relationship is defined by the equation m=E/c², indicating that the gravitational influence of a single photon is minimal. However, when considering the cumulative effect of EM radiation within a galaxy, this force may become significant enough to account for the motion of outer objects, potentially serving as a candidate for dark matter. The conversation suggests performing calculations using solar luminosity to estimate the ratio of EM radiation energy to rest energy in celestial bodies.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational lensing and its implications
  • Familiarity with the equation m=E/c²
  • Basic knowledge of solar luminosity and its calculations
  • Concept of dark matter and its role in galactic dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Calculate the gravitational attraction of EM radiation using solar luminosity
  • Research the implications of gravitational lensing on galaxy formation
  • Investigate the role of dark matter in galactic motion
  • Explore advanced concepts in general relativity related to energy and gravity
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, and astrophysicists interested in the interplay between electromagnetic radiation and gravitational forces, as well as those researching dark matter and galaxy dynamics.

esmeralda4
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Since we can observe gravitational lensing and conclude that mass can affect the path of EM radiation it seems logical to me to assume that EM radiation will exert a slight gravitational attraction of it's own on a mass,- although I do not recall ever reading about this.

Presumably the gravitational attraction that a single photon of EM radiation will exert is proportional to it's mass where m=E/c(squared) and the distance between the photon and the mass. Clearly we are considering an incredibly weak force if this is to be calculated.

However, if the total gravitational attraction due to the total EM radiation within a galaxy is calculated this would now become significant. Could this explain the observed motion of the outermost objects within galaxies and therefore be a candidate for dark matter?

Many thanks for reading.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
esmeralda4 said:
Since we can observe gravitational lensing and conclude that mass can affect the path of EM radiation it seems logical to me to assume that EM radiation will exert a slight gravitational attraction of it's own on a mass,- although I do not recall ever reading about this.

Presumably the gravitational attraction that a single photon of EM radiation will exert is proportional to it's mass where m=E/c(squared) and the distance between the photon and the mass. Clearly we are considering an incredibly weak force if this is to be calculated.

However, if the total gravitational attraction due to the total EM radiation within a galaxy is calculated this would now become significant. Could this explain the observed motion of the outermost objects within galaxies and therefore be a candidate for dark matter?

Many thanks for reading.

It is true that in theory the energy of EM radiation should act as a gravitational source, but the effect is incredibly tiny.

Given that the energy of the EM radiation emitted by the material in a galaxy comes from its rest mass, I'd guess that the fraction of the total energy in the form of EM radiation would be extremely small.

Why not do a calculation to estimate the ratio of EM radiation energy to rest energy, at least very roughly, by using the sun as an example? You can calculate the amount of energy the sun radiates away (look up "solar luminosity") on a time scale corresponding to the radius of a galaxy at light speed, then compare the mass of that energy to the mass of the sun.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K