Gravitational Potential Energy of astronaut

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the mass of an asteroid based on the gravitational potential energy of a 120kg astronaut. The astronaut, with 15J of kinetic energy, reaches a maximum height of 300m above the asteroid's surface, which has a radius of 600m. The correct mass of the asteroid is determined to be 3.4 x 1012 kg, derived from the equation EK = Epg, where gravitational force is applied. A common error identified in the calculations involves neglecting the potential energy at the surface of the asteroid.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy concepts
  • Familiarity with the universal law of gravitation
  • Basic algebra for solving equations involving gravitational forces
  • Knowledge of energy conservation principles in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the universal law of gravitation and its applications in astrophysics
  • Learn about energy conservation in mechanical systems
  • Explore gravitational potential energy calculations in varying contexts
  • Investigate common errors in energy conservation problems and how to avoid them
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in gravitational mechanics and energy conservation principles will benefit from this discussion.

Erwin Schrodinger
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
A 120kg astronaut stands on the surface of an asteroid of radius 600m. The astrunaut leaves the surface with 15J of kinetic energy and reaches a maximum height of 300m above the surface. What is the mass of the asteroid? (Answer: 3.4*1012kg)

At the maximum height, all of the kinetic energy becomes potential gravitational energy.

EK = Epg
15 = Gmm'/r
15 = 6.67*10-11*120*m'/(300+600)
1.7*1012kg = m'

I think there's an error in the calculation somewhere because my answer is exactly half the correct answer but I can't figure out what I'm doing wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know but at first sight, you don't take into account the pot. energy at the surface-...does this make sense, like : Kinetic+potenial=converved=15-Gmm'/600=0-Gmm'/900 ??
 
Remember, you want the change in potential energy, not the potential energy itself.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
44
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K