Gravitational redshift with time dilation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating gravitational time dilation for a satellite 50,000 km above Earth, traveling at 10,000 km/h. The relevant formula for time dilation is provided as √(1-((2GMhf/c*r)/c²)-v²/c²), where U=GM/r. The conversation highlights the importance of using consistent units, particularly converting velocity from km/h to meters per second, and acknowledges the Earth's rotation affecting the ground observer's velocity. The participants emphasize the need for precise calculations and correct application of the formula.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational physics and general relativity
  • Familiarity with time dilation concepts
  • Proficiency in using the formula for gravitational potential energy (U=GM/r)
  • Ability to convert units, specifically from km/h to meters per second
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of time dilation due to gravity and motion
  • Learn about the effects of Earth's rotation on time measurements
  • Explore the implications of gravitational redshift in astrophysics
  • Practice calculations involving relativistic effects using different velocities
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, aerospace engineers, students studying general relativity, and anyone interested in the effects of gravity on time perception.

EdisT
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hello, thanks for reading this. I need help trying to find a way to calculate the time dilation due to gravity, from a satellite 50,000km above the surface of the Earth, traveling 10,000km/h relative to a stationary observer on Earth.

A signal is being sent from the satellite to the observer, the frequency of the signal is 1.7 gigahertz (1.7E9 Hz).. Now i calculated the change in frequency due to gravitational blueshift through the conservation of energy formula, but i don't know how to continue from there and turn the change in frequency to time dilation.

Any help is much appreciated! I would love to see the step by step calculations if you do decide to help, thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So for the ground observer it would be:
√(1-((2GMhf/c*r)/c^2) - 10000^2/2997924582^2

where m = hf/c
 
Last edited:
U=GM/r. m never enters into it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: EdisT
Ah my bad, but if the rest is correct then I would like to thank you very much!
 
DaleSpam said:
U=GM/r. m never enters into it.
one of the observers is relatively stationary, does that mean that for one of the calculations, v=0?
 
EdisT said:
one of the observers is relatively stationary, does that mean that for one of the calculations, v=0?

DaleSpam said:
Yes.

Actually, an observer who is "stationary" on Earth is not motionless for purposes of this calculation, because the Earth is rotating, and the formula DaleSpam gave is relative to a frame which is not rotating with the Earth. So the correct ##v## for the ground observer is his velocity due to the Earth's rotation (about 450 meters per second if he's on the equator, it gets smaller towards the poles and is zero at the poles).
 
EdisT said:
for the ground observer it would be:
√(1-((2GMhf/c*r)/c^2) - 10000^2/2997924582^2

As DaleSpam said, ##U = GM / r##, the other factors shouldn't be there in the first term. In the second term, first of all, this looks like the ##v## for the satellite, not the ground observer (##v## for the ground observer should be what I said in my previous post), and it's in the wrong units: in your OP, you said 10,000 km/h, but ##v## should be in meters per second since you gave ##c## in meters per second; you have to use consistent units throughout. (Also there seems to be an extra ##2## at the end of your value for ##c##, ##c## should be 299792458 meters per second.)
 
  • #10
PeterDonis said:
an observer who is "stationary" on Earth is not motionless for purposes of this calculation, because the Earth is rotating
Yes, good point.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 103 ·
4
Replies
103
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
822
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K