Green's function for massive photon theory

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the Green's function for a massive photon theory based on the Lagrangian presented in "Quantum Field Theory In a Nutshell" by A. Zee. The equations of motion lead to the requirement of finding the inverse of a differential operator, resulting in the expression for the Green's function. The final form of the Green's function is given as $$D_{\nu \rho}(k) = \frac{-\eta_{\nu \rho} + k_{\nu}k_{\rho}/m^2}{k^2 - m^2}$$, which is derived through momentum space analysis and the use of Fourier representation. The discussion clarifies the importance of the time-ordered propagator in perturbation theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Field Theory (QFT)
  • Familiarity with Lagrangian mechanics
  • Knowledge of Green's functions and their applications
  • Proficiency in Fourier transforms and momentum space analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Green's functions in Quantum Field Theory
  • Learn about the time-ordered propagator in perturbation theory
  • Explore the implications of massive versus massless particles in QFT
  • Investigate the role of gauge invariance in quantum field theories
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and students in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on Quantum Field Theory and the mathematical foundations of particle physics.

JD_PM
Messages
1,125
Reaction score
156
TL;DR
I want to understand how to derive the Green's function for the massive photon 'toy' theory, which I studied from section 1.5, Quantum Field Theory In a Nutshell by A. Zee
I am studying the 'toy' Lagrangian (Quantum Field Theory In a Nutshell by A.Zee).

$$\mathcal{L} = - \frac{1}{4} F_{\mu \nu}F^{\mu \nu} + \frac{m^2}{2}A_{\mu}A^{\mu}$$

Which assumes a massive photon (which is of course not what it is experimentally observed; photons are massless).

The equations of motion (E.O.M.) of the theory are given by

$$\Box A^{\mu} - \partial^{\mu}(\partial_{\nu}A^{\nu}) + m^2A^{\mu} = 0 \tag{1}$$

We can rewrite ##(1)## as follows

$$\left[ (\Box + m^2)\eta^{\mu \nu} - \partial^{\mu}\partial^{\nu} \right]A_{\nu}= 0 \tag{2}$$

Now to find the Green's function ##D_{\nu \rho}(x)## we 'have to find the inverse of the differential operator in the square bracket' i.e. we have to find ##D_{\nu \rho}(x)## so that the following equation is satisfied

$$\left[ (\Box + m^2)\eta^{\mu \nu} - \partial^{\mu}\partial^{\nu} \right]D_{\nu \rho}(x)= \delta_{\rho}^{\mu} \delta^{(4)}(x) \tag{3}$$

I see that taking ##(3)## to momentum space (where I used ##\partial_{\mu} \to ik_{\mu}##) yields

$$\left[ -(k^2 - m^2)\eta^{\mu \nu} + k^{\mu}k^{\nu} \right]D_{\nu \rho}(k)= \delta_{\rho}^{\mu} \tag{4}$$

But then Zee simply states the result

$$D_{\nu \rho}(k) = \frac{-\eta_{\nu \rho} + k_{\nu}k_{\rho}/m^2}{k^2 - m^2} \tag{5}$$

Might you please shed light on how to get ##(5)##?

Thanks! :biggrin:

PS: I attached A. Zee's relevant pages.
 

Attachments

  • cjscsdjckdspcùsd^cd.png
    cjscsdjckdspcùsd^cd.png
    140.4 KB · Views: 186
  • cjoidjcijdsicjds.png
    cjoidjcijdsicjds.png
    28.6 KB · Views: 195
Physics news on Phys.org
You get it as any free propgator from solving for the Green's function. The Green's function in this case is a tensor ##G_{\mu \nu}(x-y)## and it obeys by definition the equation of motion
$$(-\Box G_{\mu \nu} + \partial^{\mu} \partial^{\rho} G_{\rho \nu}-m^2 G^{\mu \nu}=-\eta_{\mu \nu} \delta^{(4)}(x-y).$$
All the derivatives apply to to the four-vector ##x##.

Now consider the Fourier representation
$$G_{\mu \nu}(x-y)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^4} \mathrm{d}^4 p \frac{1}{(2 \pi)^4} \tilde{G}_{\mu \nu}(p) \exp[-\mathrm{i} p \cdot (x-y)].$$
Plugging this into the equation of motion yields
$$(p^2-m^2) \tilde{G}_{\mu \nu} -p_{\mu} p^{\rho} \tilde{G}_{\rho \nu} = -\eta_{\mu \nu}. \qquad (*)$$
Of course ##\tilde{G}_{\mu \nu}## must be built with ##p_{\mu} p_{\nu}## and ##\eta_{\mu \nu}##. To solve the equation we thus make the ansatz
$$\tilde{G}_{\mu \nu}=\tilde{G}_{1}(p^2) \eta_{\mu \nu}+ \tilde{G}_{2}(p^2) p_{\mu} p_{\nu}/p^2.$$
Plugging this into (*) you get [EDIT: Corrected in view of #2]
$$\eta_{\mu \nu} (p^2-m^2)\tilde{G}_1 - p_{\mu} p_{\nu} (\tilde{G}_1+m^2/p^2 \tilde{G}_2)=-\eta_{\mu \nu}.$$
From this we get
$$\tilde{G}_1=-\frac{1}{p^2-m^2}, \quad \tilde{G}_2=-p^2/m^2 \tilde{G}_1,$$
i.e., finally
$$\tilde{G}_{\mu \nu} = \frac{1}{p^2-m^2} (-\eta_{\mu \nu} + p_{\mu} p_{\nu}/m^2).$$
Of course, here I was as sloppy as Zee concerning the denominator (which didactically is a no-go to be honest!). You have to also know which propgator you want. In perturbation theory for vacuum QFT you need the time-ordered propgator. So the correct location of the poles is given by writing
$$\tilde{G}_{\mu \nu} = \frac{1}{p^2-m^2+\mathrm{i} 0^+} (-\eta_{\mu \nu} + p_{\mu} p_{\nu}/m^2).$$
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: JD_PM
Thank you for your reply @vanhees71. I understand how to derive Green's function now.

Just a small comment that does not modify the final answer :smile:

vanhees71 said:
Plugging this into (*) you get
$$\eta_{\mu \nu} (p^2-m^2)\tilde{G}_1 + p_{\mu} p_{\nu} (\tilde{G}_1+m^2/p^2 \tilde{G}_2)=-\eta_{\mu \nu}.$$

I get

$$\eta_{\mu \nu} (p^2-m^2)\tilde{G}_1 - p_{\mu} p_{\nu} (\tilde{G}_1+m^2/p^2 \tilde{G}_2)=-\eta_{\mu \nu}.$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Sure, that's a typo. I've corrected it in the original posting.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JD_PM

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
428
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K