Ground state of Phosphorus Problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around the ground state configuration of Phosphorus as presented in "Atomic Physics" by Budker, Kimball, and Demille. The participant identifies that Phosphorus has three P-state valence electrons and applies Hund's rule to determine the largest total spin (S=3/2) and total angular momentum (L=0). The use of a Slater determinant is noted for constructing an antisymmetric spatial wavefunction. The participant expresses confusion regarding the total angular momentum L=2 state and its energy relative to L=0, ultimately concluding that only the L=0 case is valid for three particles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hund's rule in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with Slater determinants for antisymmetrization
  • Knowledge of angular momentum addition in quantum systems
  • Concept of P-state valence electrons in atomic physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of Slater determinants in multi-electron systems
  • Study the principles of angular momentum addition for three identical particles
  • Explore the implications of symmetry in quantum states for identical particles
  • Investigate the energy levels associated with different total angular momentum states
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in atomic physics, particularly those studying quantum mechanics and the behavior of multi-electron systems, will benefit from this discussion.

r_tea
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
This problem is 1.1b out of "Atomic Physics" by Budker, Kimball, and Demille. There are solutions in the book, but I am confused:

I'm asked to find the ground state configuration of Phosphorus, which is has 3 P-state valence electrons. Following Hund's rule, we want to find a state with largest total spin (S) and largest total angular momentum (L) (I use little l and s to refer to single particle states). So for 3 electrons, picking the largest S state is easy: we get S=3/2 (i.e. |m_s=1/2 \rangle|m_s=1/2 \rangle|m_s=1/2 \rangle).

Since the spin part is chosen to be symmetric, we must construct an antisymmetric spatial wavefunction. We know all electrons are in the P manifold, so our choices of states for each particle are
l_i=1, m_{l_i}=1,0,-1

The authors go on to use a Slater determinant to find a totally anti-symmetric combination of these states for 3 particles, which coincides with the total angular momentum state |L=0, m_L=0\rangle. Great! So then the ground state will be
|S=3/2, m_S= \text{4 possible values}\rangle|L=0, m_L=0\rangle.

But what the authors don't address is the total angular momentum L=2 state, which should also be anti-symmetric (since symmetry alternates between L=3,2,1,0). And also, since L=2>L=0, it should have a lower energy according to Hund's rules, no? That is my confusion.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, I think I solved my own problem. It is true that for two identical spins the total angular momentum states follow the symmetry pattern:
L_\text{total,max} \rightarrow \text {Symmetric}
L_\text{total,max}-1 \rightarrow \text {Antisymmetric}
L_\text{total,max}-2 \rightarrow \text {Symmetric}
\text{etc.}

However, for three particles, I'm pretty sure this statement is not true. For example, in my problem I had the addition of three l=1 particles. I think the states actually look like...
L_\text{tot}=3 \rightarrow \text {Symmetric}
L_\text{tot}=2 \rightarrow \text {No def symmetry}
L_\text{tot}=1 \rightarrow \text {No def symmetry}
L_\text{tot}=0 \rightarrow \text {Antisymmetric}

Hence, only the Ltot=0 case would work for my problem.

Does anyone know any more about this many-particle addition of angular momentum? E.g., maybe the alternating symmetry works for addition of even numbers of identical particles?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K