Hamiltonian Operator: Difference vs. E?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter physicsfirzen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hamiltonian Operator
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Hamiltonian operator (H) is fundamentally different from energy (E), as H is an operator acting on a wave function (ψ) to yield E as its eigenvalue. For a free particle, the Hamiltonian is defined as H = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}, and when applied to the wave function ψ(x) = e^{ikx}, it results in E = \frac{\hbar^2 k^2}{2m}. The time-independent Schrödinger equation (SE) applies specifically to the eigenstates of H, while the time-dependent SE governs the evolution of all quantum states.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with operators in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of the Schrödinger equation (SE)
  • Basic concepts of wave functions and eigenvalues
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of the time-independent Schrödinger equation
  • Explore the concept of eigenstates and eigenvalues in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the implications of the Hamiltonian operator in quantum systems
  • Investigate the time-dependent Schrödinger equation and its applications
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, physicists focusing on quantum systems, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum theory.

physicsfirzen
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Is there any difference between Hamiltonian operator and E? Or do we describe H as an operation that is performed over (psi) to give us E as a function of (psi)??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
physicsfirzen said:
Is there any difference between Hamiltonian operator and E? Or do we describe H as an operation that is performed over (psi) to give us E as a function of (psi)??

Usually, [itex]H[/itex] is an operator, and [itex]E[/itex] is a real number, its eigenvalue. For example, for a free particle,

[itex]H = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}[/itex]

When applied to [itex]\psi(x) = e^{ikx}[/itex] you get:

[itex]H \psi = \frac{\hbar^2 k^2}{2m} \psi[/itex]

So for this particular [itex]\psi[/itex], [itex]E = \frac{\hbar^2 k^2}{2m}[/itex], which is a real number.
 
Adding to what steven said, any wave function (or more generally, quantum state) does not fulfill the time-independent SE. This only happens for the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian (in fact the time independent SE is just the eigenstate equation for H). The time dependent SE describes how any quantum state evolves, not only the Hamiltonian eigenstates (although if we know the evolution of the eigenstates, i.e., for all possible E in the time independent equation, then we can easily reconstruct the general time evolution).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K