Has anyone here read Gravity's Rainbow?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mkarger
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rainbow
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the novel "Gravity's Rainbow" by Thomas Pynchon, focusing on its complexity, themes, and the reading experience. Participants share their thoughts on the literary style, allusions, and the challenges of understanding the text, as well as personal reflections on their engagement with the book.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express admiration for the depth and complexity of "Gravity's Rainbow," noting that it contains a vast amount of information that may require multiple readings to fully grasp.
  • Others criticize the book's style, comparing it to "shredding" and suggesting that it lacks substantive meaning, despite acknowledging Pynchon's technical skill.
  • One participant argues that Pynchon's use of stream of consciousness and intricate vocabulary contributes to the difficulty of the literature but does not render it meaningless.
  • Another participant highlights paranoia as a central theme in "Gravity's Rainbow," suggesting that the writing style reflects mental illness symptoms, such as schizophrenia.
  • There are references to other authors, such as James Joyce, with some participants suggesting that Joyce's work is even more convoluted than Pynchon's.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the value and meaning of Pynchon's writing. While some appreciate the complexity and depth, others find it overly technical and lacking in substance. The discussion remains unresolved with competing views on the literary merit of the text.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of familiarity with the text and its themes, which may influence their interpretations. There is also mention of a companion reader that some find helpful in understanding the allusions and plot sequences.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in literary analysis, particularly those exploring complex modernist texts and themes of paranoia in literature, may find this discussion relevant.

mkarger
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
Read it first over the summer last year. Doing it again with a 400 page companion reader to point out all of the allusions.

The amount of information contained in this book is mind boggling. I could probably read it 10 times and only retain a fraction of what Pynchon recorded.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Also thinking about getting a GR tattoo. Trying to figure out what I want.
 
mkarger said:
Read it first over the summer last year. Doing it again with a 400 page companion reader to point out all of the allusions.

The amount of information contained in this book is mind boggling. I could probably read it 10 times and only retain a fraction of what Pynchon recorded.

I gave up about half way through because it seemed to me like the literary version of shredding. Some guy with a great deal of technique and nothing to say. If you like that sort of game, fine. I thought the same of the more recent "Infinite Jest," so maybe you would like that too.
 
ImaLooser said:
I gave up about half way through because it seemed to me like the literary version of shredding. Some guy with a great deal of technique and nothing to say.

Hey now! Pynchon and DFW have a lot to say. It just takes more effort to get the meaning out of their works, not because their writing is particularly difficult or anything, but because of the complexity and intricacies of the ideas. I get that their writing is not for everyone, and to each his own in that regard, but that they have nothing to say is way too extreme.
 
Pynchon intentionally uses stream of consciousness in various parts of his writing. It is utilized quite often in GR. He also has an immense vocabulary and an almost encyclopedic understanding of historical events. When you put all of that together, you get some extremely difficult literature. I find the companion reader highly informative. Reading it a second time has also allowed me to overcome questions about basic plot sequences.

But none of what he writes is in anyway "meaningless."
 
Last edited:
Also, one of the main themes in GR is paranoia;a symptom of mental illnesses like schizophrenia. A lot of the stream writing is suppose to induce the sense that you are going crazy. So he uses "pressured speech" and word salad techniques to get you there.
 
One last thing, if you think Pynchon is long winded and convoluted, don't ever read anything by James Joyce. Good lord. That man might actually have been crazy.
 
mkarger said:
One last thing, if you think Pynchon is long winded and convoluted, don't ever read anything by James Joyce. Good lord. That man might actually have been crazy.


Yeah, I tried that too and couldn't do it. Except for Dubliners, which I think is great.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K