Has anyone here read Gravity's Rainbow?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mkarger
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rainbow
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
Sign up Log in
7 replies · 5K views
mkarger
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
Read it first over the summer last year. Doing it again with a 400 page companion reader to point out all of the allusions.

The amount of information contained in this book is mind boggling. I could probably read it 10 times and only retain a fraction of what Pynchon recorded.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Also thinking about getting a GR tattoo. Trying to figure out what I want.
 
mkarger said:
Read it first over the summer last year. Doing it again with a 400 page companion reader to point out all of the allusions.

The amount of information contained in this book is mind boggling. I could probably read it 10 times and only retain a fraction of what Pynchon recorded.

I gave up about half way through because it seemed to me like the literary version of shredding. Some guy with a great deal of technique and nothing to say. If you like that sort of game, fine. I thought the same of the more recent "Infinite Jest," so maybe you would like that too.
 
ImaLooser said:
I gave up about half way through because it seemed to me like the literary version of shredding. Some guy with a great deal of technique and nothing to say.

Hey now! Pynchon and DFW have a lot to say. It just takes more effort to get the meaning out of their works, not because their writing is particularly difficult or anything, but because of the complexity and intricacies of the ideas. I get that their writing is not for everyone, and to each his own in that regard, but that they have nothing to say is way too extreme.
 
Pynchon intentionally uses stream of consciousness in various parts of his writing. It is utilized quite often in GR. He also has an immense vocabulary and an almost encyclopedic understanding of historical events. When you put all of that together, you get some extremely difficult literature. I find the companion reader highly informative. Reading it a second time has also allowed me to overcome questions about basic plot sequences.

But none of what he writes is in anyway "meaningless."
 
Last edited:
Also, one of the main themes in GR is paranoia;a symptom of mental illnesses like schizophrenia. A lot of the stream writing is suppose to induce the sense that you are going crazy. So he uses "pressured speech" and word salad techniques to get you there.
 
One last thing, if you think Pynchon is long winded and convoluted, don't ever read anything by James Joyce. Good lord. That man might actually have been crazy.
 
mkarger said:
One last thing, if you think Pynchon is long winded and convoluted, don't ever read anything by James Joyce. Good lord. That man might actually have been crazy.


Yeah, I tried that too and couldn't do it. Except for Dubliners, which I think is great.