Tony Stark
- 51
- 1
Has there been any recent changes in the G constant value?
The discussion centers around the value of the gravitational constant (G) and whether it has changed recently. Participants explore the implications of its measurement, variability, and the processes behind its determination, touching on both theoretical and experimental aspects.
Participants express differing views on whether G can be considered a constant, with some arguing for its variability based on Earth's changing mass and others focusing on the challenges in its measurement. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.
Participants highlight the dependence of G's value on experimental conditions and the potential for variability over geological time scales, but do not resolve these complexities.
This just means that GMearth varies slightly over time.rootone said:G cannot be a constant since the mass of the Earth is not a constant.
In fact several tonnes of micrometoric dust is accumulated every day.
Although that makes no significant difference to the measure of G over the course of a human life time, it might make a difference on geologic time scales.
Under the assumption that the physics of type Ia supernovae are universal, analysis of observations of 580 type Ia supernovae has shown that the gravitational constant has varied by less than one part in ten billion per year over the last nine billion years.
You are confusing G, the Newtonian gravitational constant, with g, gravitational acceleration at the surface of the Earth. Big G is dimensional physical constant, the G in [itex]F=\frac {Gm_1m_2}{r^2}[/itex] (Newton's law of gravitation). That is modern notation; Newton himself didn't express his law of gravitation that way, nor did Henry Cavendish, the first to measure G (but only after the fact). Cavendish intent was to "weigh the Earth".rootone said:G cannot be a constant since the mass of the Earth is not a constant.
In fact several tonnes of micrometoric dust is accumulated every day.