Has this experiment of "detecting" the quantum foam been conducted?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DyerMaker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum gravity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of conducting an experiment to detect quantum foam, as proposed in the paper by Matvei Bronstein. Participants agree that the experiment is unlikely to succeed due to overwhelming noise and physical effects, particularly the spring-like behavior of materials. Furthermore, experts capable of mitigating these issues are already engaged in their own research, making it impractical to prioritize this experiment. The conversation also highlights the need for clarity regarding the underlying physics, particularly in relation to many-body interactions and conservation of momentum.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum foam and its implications in physics
  • Familiarity with conservation of momentum in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of many-body interactions in modified gravity theories
  • Awareness of Matvei Bronstein's contributions to quantum gravity
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Matvei Bronstein's paper "Quantum theory of weak gravitational fields"
  • Explore the principles of loop quantum gravity and its critiques
  • Study perturbation analysis in general relativity
  • Investigate techniques for reducing experimental noise in quantum physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the experimental challenges of detecting quantum phenomena.

DyerMaker
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Has the J. Bekenstein's experiment of "detecting" the quantum foam [for its description please, click the link below] ever been tried to be conducted? If the answer is "no", why not?
Physics news on Phys.org
Two answers:

(1) It won't work as described. It will be dominated by noise and possibly other physical effects, i.e. when you place on a stand, you place it on a spring, because everything is a spring.

(2) People who have the expertise to reduce this noise and make this a practical experiment - if that is even possible - have their own research programs and no not need more work on their plates. They have plenty.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DyerMaker
Vanadium 50 said:
Two answers:

(1) It won't work as described. It will be dominated by noise and possibly other physical effects, i.e. when you place on a stand, you place it on a spring, because everything is a spring.

(2) People who have the expertise to reduce this noise and make this a practical experiment - if that is even possible - have their own research programs and no not need more work on their plates. They have plenty.
Thank you for the answer.
But aren't the results of this experiment so important for the modern physicians that it has a higher priority and should be conducted more rapidly?
 
Last edited:
If you think it's that important, why don't you do it? Otherwise, the argument is "this is so important other people should drop everything and do it."
 
DyerMaker said:
Thank you for the answer.
But aren't the results of this experiment so important for the modern physicians that it has a higher priority and should be conducted more rapidly?
The logic of the experiment seems dubious to me. He's arguing via conservation of momentum, that when the photon is absorbed by the block, the center of mass of the block will undergo a Planck-scale displacement (before the photon is re-emitted), and so this is an opportunity for quantum-gravitational modifications of usual laws of motion to manifest. But in reality, the photon is not absorbed by "the block", it's absorbed by an individual particle within the block.

It reminds me a bit of the debate over how to think about many-body interactions in MOND, another kind of modified gravity. At the very least, there needs to be much more clarity about how and why the process that Bekenstein proposes would show any effect at all, when analyzed from a many-body perspective.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DyerMaker
Matvei Bronstein has discovered important formulas related to the 'quantum foam' of spacetime. It is possible that he does not want to share the exact formulas, but see his paper 'Quantum theory of weak gravitational fields'

Matvei Bronstein, Quantentheorie schwacher Gravitationsfelder, Physikalische Zeitschriftder Sowjetunion, Band 9, Heft 2–3, pp. 140–157 (1936)

I should add that this should not be taken as a remark on loop quantum gravity. I am intending to publish a paper on 'Perturbation analysis of general relativity' which is the reason why I am aware of this paper.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DyerMaker

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
15K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K