MHB Have I Done Something Wrong in Solving This Hyperbolic Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hyperbolic
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on solving the hyperbolic partial differential equation (PDE) given by u_{tt}(x, t) - u_{xt}(x, t) = 0. The user attempts to transform the equation into its canonical form using the variables ξ and η, leading to conditions a^2 - ab = 0 and c^2 - cd = 0. They express confusion about the implications of these conditions, questioning if they have made an error in their approach. An alternative method is suggested, involving a change of variables to simplify the problem into a first-order PDE, which can be solved using the method of characteristics. The discussion highlights the complexity of hyperbolic equations and the methods available for their resolution.
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

I have to solve the following pde:

$$u_{tt}(x, t)-u_{xt}(x, t)=0, x \in \mathbb{R}, t>0 \\ u(x, 0)=f(x), x \in \mathbb{R} \\ u_t(x, 0)=g(x), x \in \mathbb{R}$$

I have done the following:

$$\Delta(x, t)=1>0$$

so it is an hyperbolic equation.

We want to write the equation into the canonical form, which is of the form $u_{\xi \eta}=D(\xi, \eta, u, u_{\xi}, u_{\eta})$.

$u(x, t)=U(\xi, \eta)$

$\xi=at+bx \\ \eta=ct+dx$

$$u_t=aU_{\xi}+cU_{\eta} \\ u_{tt}=a^2U_{\xi \xi}+2acU_{\xi \eta}+c^2U_{\eta \eta} \\ u_{xt}=u_{tx}abU_{\xi \xi}+adU_{\xi \eta}++cbU_{\eta \xi}+cdU_{\eta \eta}$$

$$u_{tt}-u_{xt}=0 \Rightarrow (a^2-ab)U_{\xi \xi}+(2ac-ad-cb)U_{\xi \eta}+(c^2-cd)U_{\eta \eta}=0$$

Since it is hyperbolic, it has to stand that $$a^2-ab=0 \text{ and } c^2-cd=0 \\ \Rightarrow \left (a=0 \text{ or } a=b\right ) \text{ and } \left (c=0 \text{ or } c=d\right )$$

For these values we get $0 \cdot U_{\xi \eta }=0$, or not?? (Wondering)

Have I done something wrong?? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mathmari said:
Hey! :o

I have to solve the following pde:

$$u_{tt}(x, t)-u_{xt}(x, t)=0, x \in \mathbb{R}, t>0 \\ u(x, 0)=f(x), x \in \mathbb{R} \\ u_t(x, 0)=g(x), x \in \mathbb{R}$$

I have done the following:

$$\Delta(x, t)=1>0$$

so it is an hyperbolic equation.

We want to write the equation into the canonical form, which is of the form $u_{\xi \eta}=D(\xi, \eta, u, u_{\xi}, u_{\eta})$.

$u(x, t)=U(\xi, \eta)$

$\xi=at+bx \\ \eta=ct+dx$

$$u_t=aU_{\xi}+cU_{\eta} \\ u_{tt}=a^2U_{\xi \xi}+2acU_{\xi \eta}+c^2U_{\eta \eta} \\ u_{xt}=u_{tx}abU_{\xi \xi}+adU_{\xi \eta}++cbU_{\eta \xi}+cdU_{\eta \eta}$$

$$u_{tt}-u_{xt}=0 \Rightarrow (a^2-ab)U_{\xi \xi}+(2ac-ad-cb)U_{\xi \eta}+(c^2-cd)U_{\eta \eta}=0$$

Since it is hyperbolic, it has to stand that $$a^2-ab=0 \text{ and } c^2-cd=0 \\ \Rightarrow \left (a=0 \text{ or } a=b\right ) \text{ and } \left (c=0 \text{ or } c=d\right )$$

For these values we get $0 \cdot U_{\xi \eta }=0$, or not?? (Wondering)

Have I done something wrong?? (Wondering)

A possible approach to the second order PDE...

$$u_{tt}(x, t)-u_{xt}(x, t)=0, x \in \mathbb{R}, t>0 \\ u(x, 0)=f(x), x \in \mathbb{R} \\ u_t(x, 0)=g(x), x \in \mathbb{R}\ (1)$$

... may be the following: setting $\displaystyle u_{t} (x,t) = v (x,t)$ You arrive to write...

$$v_{t} - v_{x}=0, x \in \mathbb{R}, t>0 \\ v(x, 0)=g(x), x \in \mathbb{R}\ (2)$$

... the solution of which [though method of characteristics...] is easy enough...

$\displaystyle \frac{d t}{d x} = 1 \implies t = c_{1} - x \implies c_{1} = t + x \implies v = g(t + x)\ (3)$

At this point You have to solve the first order PDE...

$$u_{t} (x,t) = g(t + x), x \in \mathbb{R}, t>0 \\ u(x, 0)=f(x), x \in \mathbb{R}\ (4)$$

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K