MHB Have I Done Something Wrong in Solving This Hyperbolic Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hyperbolic
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the hyperbolic partial differential equation (PDE) given by $$u_{tt}(x, t)-u_{xt}(x, t)=0$$ with initial conditions $$u(x, 0)=f(x)$$ and $$u_t(x, 0)=g(x)$$. The participants analyze the canonical form of the equation and derive conditions for the coefficients, concluding that $$a^2-ab=0$$ and $$c^2-cd=0$$ lead to potential solutions. A proposed method involves transforming the second-order PDE into a first-order PDE using the substitution $$u_{t}(x,t) = v(x,t)$$, which simplifies the problem significantly.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of hyperbolic partial differential equations (PDEs)
  • Familiarity with canonical forms of PDEs
  • Knowledge of the method of characteristics for solving first-order PDEs
  • Basic concepts of initial value problems in differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of characteristics in detail for solving first-order PDEs
  • Learn about canonical forms of second-order hyperbolic equations
  • Explore numerical methods for solving hyperbolic PDEs
  • Investigate the implications of initial conditions on the solutions of PDEs
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers dealing with wave propagation, anyone interested in solving hyperbolic partial differential equations, and students studying advanced differential equations.

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

I have to solve the following pde:

$$u_{tt}(x, t)-u_{xt}(x, t)=0, x \in \mathbb{R}, t>0 \\ u(x, 0)=f(x), x \in \mathbb{R} \\ u_t(x, 0)=g(x), x \in \mathbb{R}$$

I have done the following:

$$\Delta(x, t)=1>0$$

so it is an hyperbolic equation.

We want to write the equation into the canonical form, which is of the form $u_{\xi \eta}=D(\xi, \eta, u, u_{\xi}, u_{\eta})$.

$u(x, t)=U(\xi, \eta)$

$\xi=at+bx \\ \eta=ct+dx$

$$u_t=aU_{\xi}+cU_{\eta} \\ u_{tt}=a^2U_{\xi \xi}+2acU_{\xi \eta}+c^2U_{\eta \eta} \\ u_{xt}=u_{tx}abU_{\xi \xi}+adU_{\xi \eta}++cbU_{\eta \xi}+cdU_{\eta \eta}$$

$$u_{tt}-u_{xt}=0 \Rightarrow (a^2-ab)U_{\xi \xi}+(2ac-ad-cb)U_{\xi \eta}+(c^2-cd)U_{\eta \eta}=0$$

Since it is hyperbolic, it has to stand that $$a^2-ab=0 \text{ and } c^2-cd=0 \\ \Rightarrow \left (a=0 \text{ or } a=b\right ) \text{ and } \left (c=0 \text{ or } c=d\right )$$

For these values we get $0 \cdot U_{\xi \eta }=0$, or not?? (Wondering)

Have I done something wrong?? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mathmari said:
Hey! :o

I have to solve the following pde:

$$u_{tt}(x, t)-u_{xt}(x, t)=0, x \in \mathbb{R}, t>0 \\ u(x, 0)=f(x), x \in \mathbb{R} \\ u_t(x, 0)=g(x), x \in \mathbb{R}$$

I have done the following:

$$\Delta(x, t)=1>0$$

so it is an hyperbolic equation.

We want to write the equation into the canonical form, which is of the form $u_{\xi \eta}=D(\xi, \eta, u, u_{\xi}, u_{\eta})$.

$u(x, t)=U(\xi, \eta)$

$\xi=at+bx \\ \eta=ct+dx$

$$u_t=aU_{\xi}+cU_{\eta} \\ u_{tt}=a^2U_{\xi \xi}+2acU_{\xi \eta}+c^2U_{\eta \eta} \\ u_{xt}=u_{tx}abU_{\xi \xi}+adU_{\xi \eta}++cbU_{\eta \xi}+cdU_{\eta \eta}$$

$$u_{tt}-u_{xt}=0 \Rightarrow (a^2-ab)U_{\xi \xi}+(2ac-ad-cb)U_{\xi \eta}+(c^2-cd)U_{\eta \eta}=0$$

Since it is hyperbolic, it has to stand that $$a^2-ab=0 \text{ and } c^2-cd=0 \\ \Rightarrow \left (a=0 \text{ or } a=b\right ) \text{ and } \left (c=0 \text{ or } c=d\right )$$

For these values we get $0 \cdot U_{\xi \eta }=0$, or not?? (Wondering)

Have I done something wrong?? (Wondering)

A possible approach to the second order PDE...

$$u_{tt}(x, t)-u_{xt}(x, t)=0, x \in \mathbb{R}, t>0 \\ u(x, 0)=f(x), x \in \mathbb{R} \\ u_t(x, 0)=g(x), x \in \mathbb{R}\ (1)$$

... may be the following: setting $\displaystyle u_{t} (x,t) = v (x,t)$ You arrive to write...

$$v_{t} - v_{x}=0, x \in \mathbb{R}, t>0 \\ v(x, 0)=g(x), x \in \mathbb{R}\ (2)$$

... the solution of which [though method of characteristics...] is easy enough...

$\displaystyle \frac{d t}{d x} = 1 \implies t = c_{1} - x \implies c_{1} = t + x \implies v = g(t + x)\ (3)$

At this point You have to solve the first order PDE...

$$u_{t} (x,t) = g(t + x), x \in \mathbb{R}, t>0 \\ u(x, 0)=f(x), x \in \mathbb{R}\ (4)$$

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K