Having trouble with time (in)dependant solutions

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ChaosCon343
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the time-dependent and time-independent solutions of the Schrödinger equation, specifically in the context of quantum mechanics. The time-independent Schrödinger equation is derived by separating space and time variables, allowing for the reconstruction of any arbitrary wave function \(\Psi(x,t)\) through superposition of time-independent solutions. The solutions are expressed as \(\Psi(x,t) = \phi_E(x)e^{-\frac{i}{\hbar}Et}\) for discrete spectra and \(\Psi(x,t) = \int_0^{\infty} a(E)\phi_E(x) e^{-\frac{i}{\hbar}Et}\;dE\) for continuous spectra. A wave packet, formed from a superposition of states with different energies, is essential for exhibiting time-dependence in observable quantities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Schrödinger equation in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with concepts of wave functions and probability densities
  • Knowledge of superposition principles in quantum systems
  • Basic grasp of quantum states and energy levels
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the time-independent Schrödinger equation in detail
  • Explore the concept of wave packets and their role in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the implications of superposition in quantum systems
  • Investigate the relationship between energy levels and wave functions in potential wells
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, physicists, and anyone interested in understanding the foundational concepts of time-dependent and time-independent solutions in quantum theory.

ChaosCon343
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hey all -

I'm taking my first quantum class this year, and I'm still on really shaky ground about time-dependent and time-independent solutions of the Schrödinger equation. I understand that the time independent Schrödinger equation comes from separating your space and time variables, but I have trouble interpreting the meanings of both types of solutions. Particularly, why can you reconstruct any arbitrary [tex]\Psi(x,t)[/tex] out of the time-independent solutions? Rather, why can an electron in, say, an infinite square well potential have different [tex]\Psi[/tex]'s?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Solve the time-dependent Schroedinger equation [tex]i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\Psi(x,t) = H\Psi(x,t)[/tex] by separation of variables to give the following particular solutions (which have the counterintuitive property of predicting time-independent observables):

[tex] \Psi(x,t) = \phi_E(x)e^{-\frac{i}{\hbar}Et}\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;|\Psi(x,t)|^2 = |\phi_E(x)|^2[/tex]

Where has the time gone? It is restored to us by a general solution to the TDSE - an arbitrary superposition of the particular solutions:

[tex] \Psi(x,t) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a_n\phi_n(x) e^{-\frac{i}{\hbar}E_nt} \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\text{\mathrm{(discrete\;spectrum)}}[/tex]

[tex] \Psi(x,t) = \int_0^{\infty} a(E)\phi_E(x) e^{-\frac{i}{\hbar}Et}\;dE \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\text{\mathrm{(continuous \; spectrum)}}[/tex]

Quite generally, a wave packet - a superposition of states having different energies - is required in order to have a time-dependence in the probability density and in other observable quantities, such as the average position or momentum of a particle.
Simplest example: a linear combination of just two particular solutions

[tex]\Psi(x,t) = a\phi_E(x) e^{-\frac{i}{\hbar}Et} + b\phi_{E'}(x) e^{-\frac{i}{\hbar}E't}[/tex].

The probability density is given by:

[tex] |\Psi(x,t)|^2 = |a|^2|\phi_E(x)|^2 + |b|^2|\Psi_{E'}(x)|^2 + 2\mathrm{Re}\left\{a^*b\phi_E^*(x)\phi_{E'}(x)\mathrm{e}^{-i\frac{(E'-E)t}{\hbar}}\right\}[/tex]

All the time-dependence is contained in the interference term.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K