I Hawking Radiation Extrapolation: A Conjecture

Click For Summary
Intense gravity near a black hole's event horizon leads to the spontaneous creation of complementary particles. This phenomenon is even more pronounced just inside the event horizon due to stronger gravitational fields. Near the singularity, particles are generated at a high rate, creating a "fuzz" of particles that momentarily borrow mass from the singularity. The discussion raises the possibility that a singularity may not exist at all, suggesting a continuous presence of these particles instead. However, without a solid theoretical framework, further exploration of this concept remains pending.
Mike Holland
Messages
114
Reaction score
1
The intense gravity near the event horizon causes complementary particles to pop into existence spontaneously. As local space-time is continuous through the EV, the same would be happening just inside the EV, only more so as the gravity field and gradient is greater. So near the singularity particles would be appearing at a very high rate, and there would be a fuzz of particles appearing and then disappearing down the plug hole. All these particles would borrow a little of the singularity mass, so at any one time a proportion of the mass would be in these particles and not in the singularity. Perhaps there is no singularity, and just a fuzz of particles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mike Holland said:
Perhaps there is no singularity, and just a fuzz of particles
Perhaps. But we currently have no theory about it, so we will have to wait a considerable time to discuss it here.
 
  • Like
Likes dsaun777 and topsquark

Thread 'Jackson: justification of the Poynting vector by GR'

The Poynting vector is a definition, that is supposed to represent the energy flow at each point. Unfortunately, the only observable effect caused by the Poynting vector is through the energy variation in a volume subject to an energy flux through its surface, that is, the Poynting theorem. As a curl could be added to the Poynting vector without changing the Poynting theorem, it can not be decided by EM only that this should be the actual flow of energy at each point. Feynman, commenting...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Hawking Radiation: Can Particles Appear with Relativistic Velocities?
Replies
4
Views
2K
B Question about the Entropy of a Black Hole Singularity
Replies
17
Views
3K
I How Does Hawking Radiation Lead to Black Hole Evaporation?
Replies
8
Views
2K
A Negative energy in Hawking radiation
Replies
1
Views
1K
A Hawking Radiation Inside a Black Hole: Theory & Possibilities
Replies
7
Views
2K
I Hawking Radiation: Info vs Semanticity? - Hossenfelder
Replies
4
Views
2K
A Validity of theoretical arguments for Unruh and Hawking radiation
3
Replies
146
Views
11K
B The Singularity and Hawking radiation
Replies
7
Views
2K
I I don't see how a black hole's event horizon can be crossed
2
Replies
73
Views
900
I Negative Mass and Hawking Radiation
Replies
6
Views
3K