MHB Heather's Mathematical Model Question on Herbicide Absorption

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a mathematical model for herbicide absorption in leaves, focusing on two scenarios: one where herbicide is absorbed solely from the surface and another where it is also dispersed by the plant's circulatory system. In the first case, the concentration in the leaf over time is modeled as C(t) = Ca(1 - e^(-αt)), reaching a maximum concentration of Ca. In the second scenario, the model incorporates a dispersal rate, leading to a modified concentration equation C(t) = (αCa/(α + β))(1 - e^(-(α + β)t)), which approaches a lower maximum concentration of αCa/(α + β). The key difference between the two models is the limiting concentration, with the second model achieving a lower steady state due to the herbicide's removal from the leaf. This analysis highlights the impact of the plant's circulatory system on herbicide absorption dynamics.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Mathematical Model Question?

A simple model for the absorption of a herbicide placed on the surface of a leaf is that it will be absorbed at a rate proportional to the difference in concentration between that on the surface and that on the interior. Assume the rate constant is α.

(a) If a layer with constant concentration Ca is placed on the leaf, write an equation for the concentration of herbicide in the leaf, C(t) as time progresses.

(b) Solve the equation for concentration C(t) if there is no herbicide in the leaf to begin.

(c) Now suppose the plant circulatory system (xylem and phloem) disperses the herbicide throughout the plant with rate proportional to concentration in the leaf and rate constant β. Modify your equation accordingly and hence your solution.

(d) What is the difference in outcome between cases in (b) and (c)?

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can see my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Heather,

(a) The time rate of change of herbicide in the leaf is proportional to the difference between the constant concentration on the surface and the variable concentration in the leaf, so we may state:

$$\frac{dC}{dt}=\alpha\left(C_a-C \right)$$ where $$0<\alpha$$

(b) We are given the initial value $$C(0)=0$$ and asked to solve the resulting initial value problem (IVP).

To solve the ordinary differential equation (ODE), we may either separate variables or write in standard linear form, and use in integration factor. I will demonstrate both methods.

i) Separate variables:

We may thus write the ODE as:

$$\frac{1}{C-C_a}\,dC=-\alpha\,dt$$

Integrate, switching dummy variables and using the boundaries as the limits of integration:

$$\int_0^{C}\frac{1}{u-C_a}\,du=-\alpha\int_0^t\,dv$$

Applying the fundamental theorem of calculus (FTOC), we obtain:

$$\left[\ln\left|u-C_a \right| \right]_0^C=-\alpha\left[v \right]_0^t$$

$$\ln\left|\frac{C-C_a}{-C_a} \right|=-\alpha t$$

Convert from logarithmic to exponential form:

$$\frac{C-C_a}{-C_a}=e^{-\alpha t}$$

Solving for $C(t)$, we obtain:

$$C(t)=C_a\left(1-e^{-\alpha t} \right)$$

ii) Express as linear ODE

$$\frac{dC}{dt}+\alpha C=\alpha C_a$$

Compute the integrating factor:

$$\mu(t)=e^{\alpha\int\,dt}=e^{\alpha t}$$

Multiply the ODE by this factor:

$$e^{\alpha t}\frac{dC}{dt}+\alpha e^{\alpha t}C=\alpha C_ae^{\alpha t}$$

Rewrite the left side as the differentiation of a product:

$$\frac{d}{dt}\left(e^{\alpha t}C \right)=\alpha C_ae^{\alpha t}$$

Integrate with respect to $t$

$$\int\,d\left(e^{\alpha t}C \right)=\alpha C_a\int e^{\alpha t}\,dt$$

$$e^{\alpha t}C=C_ae^{\alpha t}+c_1$$

Solve for $C(t)$:

$$C(t)=C_a+c_1e^{-\alpha t}$$

Use the initial values to determine the parameter $c_1$ (the constant of integration):

$$C(0)=C_a+c_1=0\,\therefore\,c_1=-C_a$$

And so we find the solution satisfying the given conditions is:

$$C(t)=C_a\left(1-e^{-\alpha t} \right)$$

(c) Here we are told herbicide is also leaving the leaf at a rate proportional to $C(t)$, and so the ODE becomes:

$$\frac{dC}{dt}=\alpha\left(C_a-C \right)-\beta C$$ where $$C(0)=0$$ and $$0<\alpha,\beta$$

While we could still use both methods to solve the resulting IVP, let's just use the linear method. So, let's express the ODE in standard linear form:

$$\frac{dC}{dt}+(\alpha+\beta)C=\alpha C_a$$

Computing the integrating factor, we find:

$$\mu(t)=e^{(\alpha+\beta)\int\,dt}=e^{(\alpha+\beta)t}$$

And so the ODE becomes:

$$e^{(\alpha+\beta)t}\frac{dC}{dt}+(\alpha+\beta)e^{(\alpha+\beta)t}C=\alpha C_ae^{(\alpha+\beta)t}$$

Expressing the left side as the differentiation of a product, we obtain:

$$\frac{d}{dt}\left(e^{(\alpha+\beta)t}C \right)=\alpha C_ae^{(\alpha+\beta)t}$$

Integrate with respect to $t$:

$$\int\,d\left(e^{(\alpha+\beta)t}C \right)=\alpha C_a\int e^{(\alpha+\beta)t}\,dt$$

$$e^{(\alpha+\beta)t}C=\frac{\alpha C_a}{\alpha+\beta}e^{(\alpha+\beta)t}+c_1$$

Solving for $C(t)$, we get:

$$C(t)=\frac{\alpha C_a}{\alpha+\beta}+c_1e^{-(\alpha+\beta)t}$$

Use the initial values to determine the parameter $c_1$ (the constant of integration):

$$C(0)=\frac{\alpha C_a}{\alpha+\beta}+c_1=0\,\therefore\,c_1=-\frac{\alpha C_a}{\alpha+\beta}$$

And so we find the solution satisfying the given conditions is:

$$C(t)=\frac{\alpha C_a}{\alpha+\beta}\left(1-e^{-(\alpha+\beta)t} \right)$$

(d) The main difference I see is in the limiting concentration in the leaf, that is the concentration as $t\to\infty$:

For the model in part (b), we have:

$$\lim_{t\to\infty}C(t)=C_a$$

And for the model in part (c), we have:

$$\lim_{t\to\infty}C(t)=\frac{\alpha C_a}{\alpha+\beta}$$

Notice if $$\beta=0$$, then the two models are equivalent, as we should expect.

Another difference is that the second model approaches its limiting value more rapidly, since the herbicide is being dispersed, or removed from the leaf, resulting in a slower rate of change. Here is a plot of two possible curves, letting $C_a=\alpha=\beta=1$:

View attachment 1215
 

Attachments

  • heather.jpg
    heather.jpg
    5.5 KB · Views: 107
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top