MHB HelloWorld's questions at Yahoo Questions invovling solids of revolution

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Revolution Solids
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here are the questions:

Volume by shells method?

Find the volume by shells of the region bounded by:

x = y^2
y = x^2

a) Rotated about the x-axis

b) Rotated about the y-axis

How would you go about solving?

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can see my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello HelloWorld,

First, we should observe that since there is cyclic symmetry between the variables, we should expect to get the same result revolving about either axis, however, I will work through both parts of the problem as if we do not know this. Also, I will use both the shell and washer methods, to demonstrate both methods, and as a check.

First, let's draw a diagram of the region to be revolved:

View attachment 1334

a) Revolving about the $x$-axis, using the shell method, we find the volume of an arbitrary shell is:

$$dV=2\pi rh\,dy$$

where:

$$r=y$$

$$h=\sqrt{y}-y^2=y^{\frac{1}{2}}-y^2$$

And so we have:

$$dV=2\pi y\left(y^{\frac{1}{2}}-y^2 \right)\,dy=2\pi \left(y^{\frac{3}{2}}-y^3 \right)\,dy$$

Summing the shells by integrating, we first determine the limits of integration. If we square the equation $x=y^2$ to get $x^2=y^4$, then equate the two expressions for $x^2$, we find:

$$y=y^4$$

$$y\left(1-y^3 \right)=0$$

$$y(1-y)\left(1+y+y^2 \right)=0$$

The two real roots are:

$$y=0,\,1$$

Which means the two curves intersect at the points $(0,0),\,(1,1)$.

Hence, we may find the volume with:

$$V=2\pi\int_0^1 y^{\frac{3}{2}}-y^3\,dy$$

Applying the FTOC, we have:

$$V=2\pi\left[\frac{2}{5}y^{\frac{5}{2}}-\frac{1}{4}y^4 \right]_0^1=2\pi\left(\frac{2}{5}-\frac{1}{4} \right)=\frac{3\pi}{10}$$

Now, let's check this by using the washer method. The volume of an arbitrary washer is:

$$dV=\pi\left(R^2-r^2 \right)\,dx$$

where:

$$R=\sqrt{x}$$

$$r=x^2$$

and so we have:

$$dV=\pi\left(\left(\sqrt{x} \right)^2-\left(x^2 \right)^2 \right)\,dx=\pi\left(x-x^4 \right)\,dx$$

Summing the washers, we find:

$$V=pi\int_0^1 x-x^4\,dx$$

Applying the FTOC, we find:

$$V=\pi\left[\frac{1}{2}x^2-\frac{1}{5}x^5 \right]_0^1=\pi\left(\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{5} \right)=\frac{3\pi}{10}$$

And this checks with the result from the shell method.

b) Revolving about the $y$-axis, using the shell method, we find the volume of an arbitrary shell is:

$$dV=2\pi rh\,dx$$

where:

$$r=x$$

$$h=\sqrt{x}-x^2=x^{\frac{1}{2}}-x^2$$

And so we have:

$$dV=2\pi x\left(x^{\frac{1}{2}}-x^2 \right)\,dy=2\pi \left(x^{\frac{3}{2}}-x^3 \right)\,dx$$

Since we will integrate from $x=0$ to $x=1$ it now becomes obvious that we will get the same volume as in part a).
 

Attachments

  • helloworld.jpg
    helloworld.jpg
    6.9 KB · Views: 77
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top