Help a fiction writer with EMF field removal

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a fictional scenario in which a character emits an electromagnetic field (EMF) and seeks a method to remove or "degauss" this field. The context is a children's science fiction novel, and participants explore various imaginative solutions while considering the balance between scientific accuracy and storytelling.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Creative brainstorming

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that taking a bath might help remove the EMF field, comparing it to how water can remove static from clothing or hair.
  • Another proposes that the character could be "supercharged" without any unpleasant side effects due to the absence of resistance.
  • A humorous suggestion is made about the character sticking their tongue into a light socket, although the side effects are noted to be unpleasant.
  • Using a tin foil suit is proposed as a potential solution to the problem of the EMF field.
  • One participant emphasizes that while scientific accuracy can enhance the story, it is not essential, and creative storytelling can take precedence.
  • A later reply warns that collapsing the EMF field could be dangerous, suggesting a cold bath full of ice grounded to Earth as a plausible method for removal.
  • Another participant discusses the dynamics between reactive and resistive characters, suggesting a narrative arc involving their relationship and energy interactions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present a variety of creative solutions and ideas, but there is no consensus on a single method for the character to remove the EMF field. The discussion remains open-ended with multiple competing views and imaginative suggestions.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the need for a balance between scientific concepts and the narrative requirements of fiction. The discussion reflects a range of assumptions about electromagnetic fields and their fictional manipulation.

Who May Find This Useful

Writers, particularly those in the science fiction genre, may find the creative brainstorming and exploration of scientific concepts relevant for developing plot elements that involve physics or technology.

angelbear
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello! I am a writer currently working on a children's science fiction novel. I need help with a problem of plot that hinges on my main character emitting an EMF field similar to an appliance like a hair dryer. This character is surrounded by this field and needs to get rid of it in a simple way. Now I know that people do not emit EMF fields, but for the purpose of plot this emf field can be read by a guassmeter and is 'stuck' to the character. I need the character to get rid of this field (or deguass, so to speak) and I need a simple way for him to do it. I wanted to know, would taking a bath remove a magnetic field in the same way that water removes static from clothing or hair, or dampens it?

Forgive me for my complete amateurish knowledge of physics, writing is more my suit. I would appreciate anyone who could share some thoughts on this with me on this. The solution does not have to be overly complicated but it has to make sense to both a child and a reader with a bit more knowledge of EM Fields than I have, should one chose to read.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
1. Keep out the bad guys (the RESISTANCE).
2. Your protagonist must be a complex character; able to display either volts (EMF or stand-alone) and magnetic (popular) characteristics.
3. Flip the switch. During an open circuit all magnetism converts to EMF. During a closed circuit, all EMF convert to magnetism.
 
Sticking his tongue into a light socket would probably do it, but the side-effects would be unpleasant.
 
There is no resistance, so no unpleasantness. Our hero will be supercharged.
 
Tin foil hat could do the trick. Although in this case you'll need tin foil suit.
 
Angelbear, the main thing to remember is that you are an entertainer. The more scientifically accurate your book is, the better, but total accuracy is not essential in a fictional story. A lot of the SF legends were scientists as well as writers (Heinlein, Asimov, Anderson...), but they never let complete scientific practicality get in the way of telling the story. Despite an occasional 'poetic license' circumstance, they were the ones who got me interested in real science. If you can do the same for a new generation, then your book will be a success even if there's an error to two in it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lren Zvsm
Your character would have to be careful when when getting rid of the EMF field because when the field collapses he/she might get fried. Cold bath full of ice and grounded to Earth would be reasonably plausible.
 
The objective of most writing is to teach. Fiction has the the flexibility to combine teaching with moral behavior, character development & entertainment.

Perhaps a purely reactive character and a purely resistive character might at first fear each other (because of burnout and energy exhaustion). Eventually they marry (live in equilibrium), with the reactive character providing memory and power. The resistor provides a means of converting electromagnetic energy into sound (vocal), warmth, light and work.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
Replies
44
Views
14K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K