Help discretizing this PDE (stream function)

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Daniel Sellers
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Pde
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on discretizing a partial differential equation (PDE) for a stream function ψ(j,l) on a 2D annulus grid using cylindrical coordinates. The equation involves mass density ρ, which varies with the coordinates s and Φ, and includes terms for frame rotation rate Ω and constants c0 and c1. Two discretization methods are explored: vertex-centered and cell-centered approaches. The user seeks feedback on potential flaws or instabilities in their discretization methods.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partial differential equations (PDEs)
  • Familiarity with cylindrical coordinate systems
  • Knowledge of numerical methods, specifically Gauss-Seidel methods
  • Experience with discretization techniques in computational fluid dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Gauss-Seidel method for PDEs" to understand its application in numerical solutions
  • Explore "discretization techniques for cylindrical coordinates" to enhance grid implementation
  • Study "stability analysis in numerical methods" to identify potential instabilities in discretization
  • Investigate "mass density variations in fluid dynamics" to comprehend the implications of non-constant density
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, computational fluid dynamicists, and graduate students working on numerical solutions of PDEs, particularly those involving fluid flow in cylindrical geometries.

Daniel Sellers
Messages
117
Reaction score
17
TL;DR
I have attempted two different methods of discretization for a PDE on a 2D annulus grid in cylindrical coordinates. I would appreciate anyone pointing out problems or suggesting better methods. This is part of research I am conducting as an undergrad.
I have a PDE that I want to solve for a stream function ψ(j,l) by discretizing it on a 2D annulus grid in cylindrical coordinates, then solving with guas-seidel methods (or maybe a different method, not the point):

(1/s)⋅(∂/∂s)[(s/ρ)(∂ψ/∂s)] + (1/s2)⋅(∂/∂Φ)[(1/ρ)(∂ψ/∂Φ)]

Where s and Φ are cylindrical coordinates, ρ is mass density (known through other means)

I've attempted to discretize this equation in a cell centered manner (which is what my professor suggested) but I also discretized it with ψ defined at the vertexes because it is easier for me to think about (I am fairly new to this type of numerical equation solving).

Vertex Centered Discretization (please see vertex centered grid attached):

(1/sj)⋅(1/Δs2)⋅[(sj+1j+1,l){ψj+1,l - ψj,l} - (sj-1j-1,l){ψj,l - ψj-1,l}] + (1/sj2)⋅(1/ΔΦ2)⋅[(1/ρj,l+1)⋅{ψj,l+1 - ψj,l} - (1/ρj,l-1)⋅{ψj,l - ψj,l-1}]

Cell Centered Discretization (see cell centered grid attached):

(1/sj)⋅(1/Δs2)⋅[(sj+3/2j+1,l){ψj+1,l - ψj,l} - (sj-1/2j-1,l){ψj,l - ψj-1,l}] + (1/sj+1/22)⋅(1/ΔΦ2)⋅[(1/ρj+1,l)⋅{ψj,l+1 - ψj,l} - (1/ρj-1,l)⋅{ψj,l - ψj,l-1}]

In each case I am attempting to approximate the outside differential terms by finding difference in the slope of ψ at either end of Δs for each iteration.

Does this make sense to anyone familiar with this type of numerical problem solving? Are there any obvious flaws, instabilities or oversights I've missed?
 

Attachments

  • Vertex_Center.png
    Vertex_Center.png
    4.9 KB · Views: 435
  • Cell_Center.png
    Cell_Center.png
    5.8 KB · Views: 434
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh, I should probably mention that I am only giving the terms which I need help discretizing. The rest of the equation is straightforward to discretize and is mostly constant terms.
 
Shouldn't the mass density be constant? If not, please describe the exact problem being solved.
 
No, the density depends on s and Φ, the entire equation is:

(1/s)⋅(∂/∂s)[(s/ρ)(∂ψ/∂s)] + (1/s2)⋅(∂/∂Φ)[(1/ρ)(∂ψ/∂Φ)] - 2Ω + ρ(c0 + c1ψ) = 0

Where Ω is frame rotation rate and c0, c1 are arbitrary constants (from the first and second term of a taylor expansion).
 
$$\frac{1}{s}\frac{\partial}{\partial s}\left(\frac{s}{\rho}\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial s}\right)=\frac{1}{s_i}\frac{\left[\frac{s_{i+1/2}}{\rho_{i+1/2}}(\psi_{i+1,j}-\psi_{i,j})-\frac{s_{i-1/2}}{\rho_{i-1/2}}(\psi_{i,j}-\psi_{i-1,j})\right]}{(\Delta s)^2}$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Daniel Sellers

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K