Help Martin Black Understand T2+S3=T8

  • Thread starter Thread starter MartinBlack
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a post by Martin Black, who presents a formula T2 + S3 = T8 and seeks feedback on its meaning and implications. The scope includes speculative ideas related to time, energy, and electromagnetism, but lacks clarity and established scientific context.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Martin Black proposes a formula involving time and concepts like energy and electromagnetism, suggesting it has personal significance.
  • Some participants express confusion, describing the content as gibberish and questioning its scientific validity.
  • Others suggest that the writing resembles poetry rather than a scientific argument, indicating a lack of clear physics content.
  • Martin Black insists that he is seeking constructive feedback rather than a critique of his writing style.
  • Participants emphasize the need for clarity and coherence in order to engage meaningfully with the ideas presented.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the clarity and scientific merit of the original post. While some see it as lacking substance, others acknowledge Martin's request for feedback without fully endorsing the content.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved issues regarding the definitions and interpretations of terms used in Martin's post, as well as the speculative nature of the ideas presented. The discussion reflects a tension between seeking creative expression and adhering to scientific discourse.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in the intersection of speculative ideas and scientific concepts, as well as those exploring the boundaries of communication in scientific forums.

MartinBlack
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello
can you help , I wrote this but have no idea what to do with it


Time2+Something3(something=thought=energy)(S1=strong=Love S2=week=Empty S3=Electro Magnetism= Attraction)=Time infinite T8 (T1+S3=4 2X4=8)(time remains always 1)(8=Infinity=Strength)

T2+S3=T8

can you point me in a direction where I could submit it for people to take to pieces and throw back at me please

Best wishes and thank you
Martin Black
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No offense, but it looks like gibberish - what is it supposed to be?
 
thank you no offense taken,

perhaps first you could look at it as a key. if you can understand what it says to me it opens the door of communication to discuss it, if however it looks like gibberish, that means gibberish is a language you do not communicate in, so I must say thank you for your time, but you can offer me no help

Best wishes

Martin Black
 
I would strongly suggest you re-read the PF Guidelines that you have explicitly agreed to. Pay particular attention to the item on over-speculative posting. It would be an ominous sign if your first posts on here are deleted because of this.

Zz.
 
The question asked was this:can you point me in a direction where I could submit it for people to take to pieces and throw back at me pleasewhich is neither overly speculative nor breaks any of the PF guidelines, I am simply seeking advice, not opening a discussion on what i have produced.

Best Wishes

Martin Black
 
I think you've been given all the advice a physics forum can offer: It reads like gibberish. I don't see any physics content here, except for the appearance of some terms (like energy, time, electromagnetism) that have standard, technical uses in physics. I have no idea what you think those terms mean or what you are trying to say.
 
omg, I thought we talked about crazy stuff in GD. This is where the loonies hang out. This guy really thinks he's come up with something profound. Reminds me of a girl I met online who's interests include quantum mechanics and favorite movie is "What the bleep do we know" she also loves David Blaine and when I said I could levitate like him she wanted me to show her how I explained how it was done and she said no she wanted to know about yogi levitation or as she called it "real" levitation
 
MartinBlack said:
can you point me in a direction where I could submit it for people to take to pieces and throw back at me please
Without meaning offense, this very seriously looks to me like something that should be submitted to a poetry forum. It reminds me a lot of some free verse that I've seen written by SF fans. It really doesn't contain any science, though, other than the words themselves.
 
MartinBlack said:
The question asked was this:


can you point me in a direction where I could submit it for people to take to pieces and throw back at me please


which is neither overly speculative nor breaks any of the PF guidelines, I am simply seeking advice, not opening a discussion on what i have produced.

Best Wishes

Martin Black

No one can give you ANY advice if the issue on hand is vague, and frankly, appear gibberish. When you were ASKED to clarify, you refused and skirted the issue as if what you wrote should have been obvious.

So you wish to be taken seriously, and that this is not some crackpot theory, please address the question that russ had asked you in the 2nd post. If not, this thread is done.

Zz.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K