Help with 3rd Order DE (r^3)*r''' - kr' = 0

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter osnarf
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving the third-order differential equation (r^3) * r''' - G*m*r' = 0, with the independent variable being t. Participants suggest using Laplace transforms, integration by parts, series solutions, and order reduction as potential methods for solving the equation. Notably, Maple software provides a solution involving non-elementary Airy wave functions, highlighting the complexity of the equation. The conversation emphasizes the challenges associated with higher-order differential equations and the necessity of advanced techniques for resolution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of third-order differential equations
  • Familiarity with Laplace transforms
  • Knowledge of integration by parts
  • Experience with series solutions in differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of Laplace transforms in solving differential equations
  • Study integration by parts specifically for differential equations
  • Explore series solutions for higher-order differential equations
  • Learn about Airy wave functions and their applications in differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, engineering students, and anyone involved in solving complex differential equations will benefit from this discussion.

osnarf
Messages
207
Reaction score
0
The equation I'm trying to solve is (r^3) * r ''' - G*m*r' = 0

the independent variable is t.

I'm not far along in DE's yet to know how to go about this but I was bored and trying to derive something and came across it. Thanks for the help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think Laplace transforms might work. The Laplace transform of (r^3) * r ''' could probably found using integration by parts. Another option would be series solutions. Perhaps there are also other way to solve it. Hmmm...It looks like you could also use order reduction.
 
A lot of simple looking differential equations are either completely intractable or at least not amenable to elementary methods. Your equation is a good example. Maple gives a solution for it in terms of non-elementary Airy wave functions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K