How to Simplify Equations Using Perturbation Method?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on applying the perturbation method to simplify equations that are analytically unsolvable. When substituting the first-order approximation x = x^{(0)} + kx^{(1)} into the equation F(x, k) = G(x, k), it is noted that F will yield terms of order k and constants, while G may include higher-order terms like k^2. The key question is whether to drop the high-order terms or set their coefficients to zero. The consensus is that since k is small, higher-order terms can be ignored, simplifying the problem. This approach allows for a clearer path to finding the first-order solution without introducing unnecessary complexity.
KFC
Messages
477
Reaction score
4
Suppose I have a equation of the form

F(x, k) = G(x, k)

which is unsolvable analytically. We apply the method of pertubtaion (k is small quantity) and let the first order solution approximated as

x = x^{(0)} + kx^{(1)}

we need to put this back to the equation and find out x^{(1)}. If after substitution, F(x, k) will only give constant term or term with k and G(x, k) will give some extra terms of order k^2. For example,

F(x, k) = ax^{(0)} + bkx^{(1)}
and
G(x, k) = cx^{(0)} + dkx^{(1)} + h k^2 (x^{(0)}-x^{(1)})

shall I directly drop the high-order term or let the coefficient of the high-order term to zero? For the later one, we will introduce another condition to solve the equation (seems not correct!?)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
When you set x= x(0)+ kx(1), you are saying that the perturbation (measured by k) is small enough that higher powers can be ignored. You drop any term with k2 or higher.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K