Help with Sequences Problem: Expressing in Terms of Variable Integer k

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mentallic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequences
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around expressing a specific sequence of angles in terms of a variable integer k. The sequence includes terms like ...-2π+θ, θ, 2π-θ, 2π+θ, 4π-θ..., and participants explore various mathematical formulations to represent this sequence without using the ± symbol.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests expressing the sequence as 2kπ ± θ but seeks an alternative to avoid the ± symbol, proposing the use of (-1)k.
  • Another participant proposes a formulation involving π(k+1)k + (-1)^k θ, questioning the original example's intent.
  • A different participant suggests using ⌊k/2⌋ 2π + (-1)^k θ as a potential solution.
  • One participant claims to have solved the problem with the expression ...-θ, θ, 2π-θ, 2π+θ, 4π-θ... = (π/2)(2k+1) + (-1)^k(θ - π/2), but later retracts this statement.
  • Another participant corrects a potential typo in the previous expressions and provides an alternative solution: ...-θ, θ, 2π-θ, 2π+θ, 4π-θ... = (-1)^k(π - θ) + 2kπ.
  • There is a discussion about the meaning of the floor function and its implications in the context of integer truncation.
  • One participant notes that k(k+1) grows quadratically, which may not align with the intended sequence growth.
  • Another participant acknowledges confusion in their previous reasoning and apologizes for the oversight.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correct formulation of the sequence, with no consensus reached on a single solution. Multiple competing expressions are proposed, and some participants question each other's formulations.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved issues regarding the appropriateness of certain mathematical expressions, particularly concerning the growth rates of proposed formulations and the implications of using the floor function.

Mentallic
Homework Helper
Messages
3,802
Reaction score
95
I want to express

...-2\pi+\theta,\theta, 2\pi-\theta, 2\pi+\theta, 4\pi-\theta...

in terms of a variable integer k.

e.g. ...-x,0,x, 2x, 3x... = kx, k E Z

So I was thinking expressing it as so: 2k\pi \pm \theta
but I believe it can be expressed in another way to avoid the \pm, using (-1)k somehow.

How can this be done?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


Mentallic said:
I want to express

...-2\pi+\theta,\theta, 2\pi-\theta, 2\pi+\theta, 4\pi-\theta...

in terms of a variable integer k.

e.g. ...-x,0,x, 2x, 3x... = kx, k E Z

So I was thinking expressing it as so: 2k\pi \pm \theta
but I believe it can be expressed in another way to avoid the \pm, using (-1)k somehow.

How can this be done?

The example sequence you gave seems to indicate you want "two plusses", "a minus", "a plus", and "a minus". Is this a mistake? If you want the sequence to alternate between plus and minus for theta and still use every integer k for 2\pi you may be able to use something like
\pi(k+1)k + (-1)^k \theta[/tex]
 


Yeah I'm not sure about your example, but I think this will do what you want.

\lfloor k/2 \rfloor 2\pi + (-1)^k \theta
 


My example was just trying to illustrate what I meant, I didn't mean for it to be similar to my problem :smile:
I think you might have a typo: \pi(k+1)k ?

Anyway, I solved it.

...-\theta,\theta,2\pi-\theta,2\pi+\theta,4\pi-\theta...=\frac{\pi}{2}\left(2k+1\right)+(-1)^k\left(\theta-\frac{\pi}{2}\right), k \in Z

edit: I was wrong :biggrin:
 
Last edited:


uart, what does that symbol you used mean?
uart said:
\lfloor k/2 \rfloor
 


Mentallic said:
I think you might have a typo: \pi(k+1)k ?
Try insert integers in (k+1)k and see what you get. It corresponds to the integer truncation uart used in his post.

Mentallic said:
Anyway, I solved it.

...-\theta,\theta,2\pi-\theta,2\pi+\theta,4\pi-\theta...=(-1)^k(\pi-\theta)+2k\pi, k \in Z
For k=0 you then get \pi - \theta. Is that included in your sequence?
 


Mentallic said:
uart, what does that symbol you used mean?

It's called "floor(x)" and it means the "largest integer less than or equal to x"
 


filiplarsen said:
Try insert integers in (k+1)k and see what you get. It corresponds to the integer truncation uart used in his post.
But k(k+1) grows at a quadratic rate, not linear.
For k=0,1,2... k(k+1)=0,2,6,12,20,30...
which grows too rapidly.


filiplarsen said:
For k=0 you then get \pi - \theta. Is that included in your sequence?
Yes sorry, I fixed up the error.


uart said:
It's called "floor(x)" and it means the "largest integer less than or equal to x"
Aha, like how computers truncate decimal expansions rather than rounding off by default :smile:
 


Mentallic said:
But k(k+1) grows at a quadratic rate, not linear.
For k=0,1,2... k(k+1)=0,2,6,12,20,30...
which grows too rapidly.

Oh my, you are quite right. What I really was trying to do was to give the same sequence as uart also gave, but some part of my brain must have been a bit too creative with trying to get rid of the integer truncation while another part must have been sleeping instead of catching the nonsense. I do apologise.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K