MHB Help with Statistical Inference

  • Thread starter Thread starter trousmate
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Statistical
trousmate
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
View attachment 3490

See image.

I have to present this on Monday and don't really know what I'm doing having missed a couple of lectures through illness. Any help or hints would be very much appreciated.

Thanks,
TM
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-11-07 at 12.38.28.png
    Screen Shot 2014-11-07 at 12.38.28.png
    6.8 KB · Views: 85
Physics news on Phys.org
trousmate said:
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/3490

See image.

I have to present this on Monday and don't really know what I'm doing having missed a couple of lectures through illness. Any help or hints would be very much appreciated.

Thanks,
TM

Wellcome on MHB trousmate!...

If You have rsamples of a r.v. Y then the likelihood function is... $\displaystyle f(y_{1}, y_{2}, ..., y_{r} | p) = p^{\sum y_{i}}\ (1-p)^{r - \sum y_{i}}\ (1)$... so that... $\displaystyle \ln f= \sum_{i} y_{i}\ \ln p - (r - \sum_{i} y_{i} )\ \ln (1 - p) \implies\frac{d \ln f}{d p } = \frac{\sum_{i} y_{i}} {p} - \frac {(r -\sum_{i} y_{i})}{1 - p}\ (2)$... and imposing$\displaystyle \frac{d \ln f}{d p} = 0$ You arrive to write... $\displaystyle \overline {p}= \frac{\sum_{i} y_{i}}{r}\ (3)$Kind regards$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
trousmate said:
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/3490

See image.

I have to present this on Monday and don't really know what I'm doing having missed a couple of lectures through illness. Any help or hints would be very much appreciated.

Thanks,
TM

For this problem you have the likelihood:

$$L(\theta|Y) = b(Y,r,\theta)=\frac{r!}{Y!(r-Y)!}\theta^Y(1-\theta)^{r-Y}$$

Then the log-likelihood is:

$$LL(\theta|Y) =\log(r!) - \log(Y!) -\log((r-Y)!)+Y\log(\theta) +(r-Y)\log(1-\theta)$$

Then to find the value of $\theta$ that maximises the log-likelihood we take the partial derivative with respect to $\theta$ and equate that to zero:

$$\frac{\partial}{\partial \theta}LL(\theta|Y)=\frac{Y}{\theta}-\frac{r-Y}{1-\theta}
$$
So for the maximum (log-)likelihood estimator $\hat{\theta}$ we have:
$$\frac{Y}{\hat{\theta}}-\frac{r-Y}{1-\hat{\theta}}=0$$

which can be rearranged to give:$$\hat{\theta}(r-Y)=(1-\hat{\theta})Y$$ or $$\hat{\theta}=\frac{Y}{r}$$

and as you should be aware of; the maximum log-likelihood estimator for this sort of problem is also the maximum likelihood estimator.

.
 
chisigma said:
Wellcome on MHB trousmate!...

If You have rsamples of a r.v. Y then the likelihood function is... $\displaystyle f(y_{1}, y_{2}, ..., y_{r} | p) = p^{\sum y_{i}}\ (1-p)^{r - \sum y_{i}}\ (1)$... so that... $\displaystyle \ln f= \sum_{i} y_{i}\ \ln p - (r - \sum_{i} y_{i} )\ \ln (1 - p) \implies\frac{d \ln f}{d p } = \frac{\sum_{i} y_{i}} {p} - \frac {(r -\sum_{i} y_{i})}{1 - p}\ (2)$... and imposing$\displaystyle \frac{d \ln f}{d p} = 0$ You arrive to write... $\displaystyle \overline {p}= \frac{\sum_{i} y_{i}}{r}\ (3)$Kind regards$\chi$ $\sigma$

Very nice but this is the solution to the wrong problem, it just happens to have the same solution as the problem as asked, but it is still the wrong problem. The data is the number of successes from r trials not a vector of results.

.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Back
Top