Is False Equivalent to Not True in Quantum Mechanics?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sridhar_n
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hi
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between the concepts of "false" and "not true" in the context of Quantum Mechanics, specifically regarding the nature of electrons as both particles and waves. Participants reference Feynman's statement that an electron is "like neither" a particle nor a wave, emphasizing the need for precise definitions of these concepts. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding wave-particle duality and the implications of the wavefunction in describing electron behavior, particularly in experiments like the two-slit experiment.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with wave-particle duality
  • Knowledge of Feynman's contributions to Quantum Mechanics
  • Basic grasp of wavefunctions and their implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Quantum Mechanics wave-particle duality" for foundational knowledge
  • Explore "Feynman's path integral formulation" to understand electron behavior
  • Study "two-slit experiment" to see practical applications of wavefunctions
  • Investigate "quantum superposition" to grasp the complexities of electron states
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying Quantum Mechanics, as well as educators seeking to clarify the concepts of wave-particle duality and electron behavior.

sridhar_n
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
If False the same as Not true?

Undoubtendly, this is a question in Quantum Mechanics which was why I put it up here and not a Philosophical Question though it may sound like one...


Sridhar
 
Physics news on Phys.org
do you have any reason to believe otherwise.
we even have the notation for it.

p-truth
~p- not truth- false.
 
...

I was just thinking if not true does not completely coincide with false. False is a "perfect" statement isn't it? Which means u are totally avoiding it.

Sridhar
 
It is well known that p ≡ ~(~p). Though what has this got to do with quantum mechanics?
 
Also I should add that a statement is only a statement if it can either be false or true, it is not a statement if it is not either (law of excluded middle)
 
Last edited:
so the statement "im a liar" isn't a statement?
 
...

Can u give me a statement on whether an electron is a particle or a wave. You shoudn't say both...

Sridhar
 
Originally posted by loop quantum gravity
so the statement "im a liar" isn't a statement?

No, because it can be true or false without contradiction. However a statemnt should not reference itself i.e.: "this statemnet is false".
 


Originally posted by sridhar_n
Can u give me a statement on whether an electron is a particle or a wave. You shoudn't say both...

Sridhar

p: An electron is a particle

is true

q: An electron exhibit wavelike properties

is also true
 
  • #10
Haven't u read abt Feynman's Statement about an Electron on whether it is a particle/wave "It is like neither"


Sridhar
 
  • #11
Originally posted by sridhar_n
Haven't u read abt Feynman's Statement about an Electron on whether it is a particle/wave "It is like neither"


Sridhar

It depends on how you define the concepts of particles and waves, an electron is classified as a particle.
 
  • #12
What Feynman was really talking about were the classical concepts of 'wave' and 'particle', which we know the electron does not follow.
 
  • #13
However the statement is Equivalent...
 
  • #14
Originally posted by sridhar_n
However the statement is Equivalent...

equivalent to whatm (also note that the wavefunction of an electron is not the same thing as the electron)? Basically: firstly you need to define the parameters of membership for the set of all particles and the set of all waves; depending on how you define these sets you might find that the electron is an element in both, one or neither. If you decide to define them as mutually exclusive yet you find that the elctron should be a member of both, there is a flaw in your definition, not in logic.
 
  • #15
also note that the wavefunction of an electron is not the same thing as the electron

Agreed.. but, the wave packet explanation of an electron obeys both the wave and particle properties.

What do u have to say abt this?

Sridhar
 
  • #16
Originally posted by sridhar_n
Agreed.. but, the wave packet explanation of an electron obeys both the wave and particle properties.

What do u have to say abt this?

Sridhar

You can't really call a single elctron a wave but wave-like behviour is certainlyu exhibited over many elctrons as a result of the wavefunction.
 
  • #17


Originally posted by jcsd
p: An electron is a particle

is true

q: An electron exhibit wavelike properties

is also true


Show me the truth?..When is a Particle TRUELY like an Electron

When are the properties of an Electron Wavelike?
 
  • #18


Originally posted by ranyart
Show me the truth?..When is a Particle TRUELY like an Electron

When are the properties of an Electron Wavelike?

An electron is always an electron, but it does show some wavelike propetires for example it's distribution in the two-slit experiment.
 
  • #19


Originally posted by jcsd
An electron is always an electron, but it does show some wavelike propetires for example it's distribution in the two-slit experiment.

Give me an Example of Electron being a true Electron 'Particle'.

Now give me the same Electron in the same configuration, showing me its 'Wavelike' properties.
 
  • #20
Originally posted by jcsd
If you decide to define them as mutually exclusive yet you find that the elctron should be a member of both, there is a flaw in your definition, not in logic.
Well said. They seem to be ignoring this.
 

Similar threads

Undergrad Does a qubit break interference in the double slit experiment?
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Graduate Multiparticle Relativistic Quantum Mechanics in an external potential
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Undergrad Energy and momentum in quantum mechanics
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Graduate Can Quantum Mechanics be postulated to exclude humans?
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
Undergrad Quantum mechanics supports solipsism?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Undergrad States and observables in quantum mechanics
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Undergrad What Are the Key Questions and Challenges in Understanding Quantum Gravity?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Undergrad Simultaneous measurements of 1 observable
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Undergrad Why do ##t## and ##-i\hbar\partial_t## not satisfy the definition of a linear map/operator in Hilbert space?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Undergrad More information on the momentum eigenstate in the position basis
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K