Holomorphic function and an open disc

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Stephen88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Disc Function
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of holomorphic functions defined on an open disc, specifically focusing on the implications of the real part being constant. Participants explore the conditions under which the function must be constant, the significance of the disc being open and connected, and provide examples where the conclusions may not hold.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that if the real part of a holomorphic function is constant in an open disc, then the function must also be constant, using the Cauchy-Riemann equations.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the proof relies on the disc being connected as well as open, noting that local constancy of the function implies global constancy in connected sets.
  • A suggestion is made to consider a disconnected set, such as the union of two disjoint open balls, to demonstrate a case where the conclusion fails.
  • Further, a generalization is proposed that if a function is locally constant on an open set, it must be constant on the connected component of that set.
  • Another participant highlights the relevance of this discussion to broader topics in complex analysis and differential geometry, mentioning related exercises involving continuous maps from connected spaces to discrete spaces.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the implications of local constancy in connected sets but explore different perspectives on the conditions necessary for the conclusions to hold. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific examples where the conclusions may not apply.

Contextual Notes

The discussion touches on the importance of the connectedness of the set and the implications of local constancy, but does not resolve the mathematical steps or assumptions involved in the examples provided.

Stephen88
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
Now the function f is holomorphic in an open disc U and that Re( f ) is
constant in U. I'm trying to show that
1)f must be constant in U.
2) the essential property of the disc U that it used here
3) an example of an open set U for which the conclusion fails.

Let f=u+vi where u is a constant.Since f is holomorphic by the Cauchy–Riemann equations->
u_x=v_y and u_y=-v_x but since u is a constant u_x=u_y=0 => 0=v_y =-v_x...therefore f is constant.
The disc U has to be open,as in:U(a,r)={z:|z-a|<r}.
Is this correct?What should I do for the last part?
Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Note that your proof of 1) actually uses the fact that the disc is connected as well as the fact that it is open.

$U$ open implies that given $p\in U$ we must have $\varepsilon > 0$ such that $B_{\varepsilon} (p) \subseteq U$. But $B_{\varepsilon} (p)$ is convex , thus $v(x) - v(p) = \bigtriangledown v (c) \cdot (x-p) = 0$ for some $c\in B_{\varepsilon} (p)$ (*) and so $v(x) = v(p)$ for all $x\in B_{\varepsilon} (p)$. Thus $u$ is locally constant, and each set $v^{-1}\left(\{a\}\right)$ is open for $a\in \mathbb{R}$, so if $U$ were connected, $v$ can take only one value (because otherwise our connected set would be the union of 2 or more disjoint non-empty open sets, which is a contradiction).

So if you want to solve (3) look at a disconnected set (for instance, the union of 2 disjoint open balls).

Here: $B_{\varepsilon}(p) := \{z \in \mathbb{C} : |z-p| < \varepsilon\}$

(*) Mean value theorem for the function $g(t) = v\left(p\cdot (1-t) + x\cdot t\right) $ , $g: [0,1] \to \mathbb{R}$. This makes sense since we are working on the convex set $B_{\varepsilon} (p)$.
 
Last edited:
I want to add something to what PaulRS said.

Paul showed that f must be locally-constant. Here is a generalization of his statement.

Here is a purely topological exercise. Show that if f is locally constant on U then it must mean that f is constant on the connected component of U. In particular if U is connected then f is constant on U.
 
Last edited:
ThePerfectHacker said:
I want to add something to what PaulRS said.

Paul showed that f must be locally-constant. Here is a generalization of his statement.

Here is a purely topological exercise. Show that if f is locally constant on U then it must mean that f is constant on the connected component of U. In particular if U is connected then f is constant on U.
This is a good exercise because of how often it shows up in things like complex analysis/differential geometry. A similar exercise which is much simpler, but actually comes up even more than the exercise TPH suggested is the trivial matter that continuous maps from connected spaces to discrete spaces are constant. Useful for proving that different branches of the logarithm differ from each other by a constant multiple of $2\pi i$.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
8K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
20K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K