Holomorphic function and an open disc

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Stephen88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Disc Function
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the properties of holomorphic functions within an open disc U, specifically addressing the implications of a constant real part of the function f. It is established that if Re(f) is constant in U, then f must also be constant in U, leveraging the Cauchy–Riemann equations. The essential property of the open disc U is its connectedness, which is crucial for the conclusion. An example of a disconnected set, such as the union of two disjoint open balls, is provided to illustrate where the conclusion fails.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of holomorphic functions and the Cauchy–Riemann equations
  • Knowledge of open sets and their properties in complex analysis
  • Familiarity with the concept of connectedness in topology
  • Basic understanding of the mean value theorem in the context of complex functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of the Cauchy–Riemann equations in complex analysis
  • Study the properties of connected and disconnected sets in topology
  • Investigate the concept of locally constant functions and their implications in connected spaces
  • Learn about the behavior of continuous maps from connected spaces to discrete spaces
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in complex analysis and topology, as well as students seeking to deepen their understanding of holomorphic functions and their properties.

Stephen88
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
Now the function f is holomorphic in an open disc U and that Re( f ) is
constant in U. I'm trying to show that
1)f must be constant in U.
2) the essential property of the disc U that it used here
3) an example of an open set U for which the conclusion fails.

Let f=u+vi where u is a constant.Since f is holomorphic by the Cauchy–Riemann equations->
u_x=v_y and u_y=-v_x but since u is a constant u_x=u_y=0 => 0=v_y =-v_x...therefore f is constant.
The disc U has to be open,as in:U(a,r)={z:|z-a|<r}.
Is this correct?What should I do for the last part?
Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Note that your proof of 1) actually uses the fact that the disc is connected as well as the fact that it is open.

$U$ open implies that given $p\in U$ we must have $\varepsilon > 0$ such that $B_{\varepsilon} (p) \subseteq U$. But $B_{\varepsilon} (p)$ is convex , thus $v(x) - v(p) = \bigtriangledown v (c) \cdot (x-p) = 0$ for some $c\in B_{\varepsilon} (p)$ (*) and so $v(x) = v(p)$ for all $x\in B_{\varepsilon} (p)$. Thus $u$ is locally constant, and each set $v^{-1}\left(\{a\}\right)$ is open for $a\in \mathbb{R}$, so if $U$ were connected, $v$ can take only one value (because otherwise our connected set would be the union of 2 or more disjoint non-empty open sets, which is a contradiction).

So if you want to solve (3) look at a disconnected set (for instance, the union of 2 disjoint open balls).

Here: $B_{\varepsilon}(p) := \{z \in \mathbb{C} : |z-p| < \varepsilon\}$

(*) Mean value theorem for the function $g(t) = v\left(p\cdot (1-t) + x\cdot t\right) $ , $g: [0,1] \to \mathbb{R}$. This makes sense since we are working on the convex set $B_{\varepsilon} (p)$.
 
Last edited:
I want to add something to what PaulRS said.

Paul showed that f must be locally-constant. Here is a generalization of his statement.

Here is a purely topological exercise. Show that if f is locally constant on U then it must mean that f is constant on the connected component of U. In particular if U is connected then f is constant on U.
 
Last edited:
ThePerfectHacker said:
I want to add something to what PaulRS said.

Paul showed that f must be locally-constant. Here is a generalization of his statement.

Here is a purely topological exercise. Show that if f is locally constant on U then it must mean that f is constant on the connected component of U. In particular if U is connected then f is constant on U.
This is a good exercise because of how often it shows up in things like complex analysis/differential geometry. A similar exercise which is much simpler, but actually comes up even more than the exercise TPH suggested is the trivial matter that continuous maps from connected spaces to discrete spaces are constant. Useful for proving that different branches of the logarithm differ from each other by a constant multiple of $2\pi i$.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
8K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
20K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K