How Accurate Are These Sig Fig Calculations and Unit Conversions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cbrowne
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on significant figure calculations and unit conversions related to a homework assignment. The user presents their calculations for various operations and conversions, seeking validation for accuracy. Key issues arise with the significant figures in some answers, particularly in the addition of scientific notation numbers and the conversion of units. The user expresses concern about losing points due to potential inaccuracies in their calculations. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of adhering to significant figure rules and proper unit conversions in mathematical operations.
cbrowne
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Hey I don't want to loose points for this primary question, could someone please go over my answers. Thanks!

Homework Statement




1. Perform the following operations and write your answers with appropriate
number of significant figures: (a) 589.01−89.020 (b) 1.0×9.00 (c) 180 /pi
(d) 180.0 /pi (e)3.901x10-5+ 1.0x10-7

2. Perform the following unit conversions and express the answer in scientific
notation: (a) 0.510 kg to g (b) 92 mi to km (c) 3 0.50 m to 3 cm (d) 15 μs to ms
(e) 60.0 km/h to m/s




The Attempt at a Solution



a) 589.01-89.020 = 499.99
b) 1.0 x 9.00 = 9.0
c) 180/ Π = 57
d) 180.0/Π = 57.30
e) 3.901 x 10^-5 + 1.0 x 10^-7 = 0.00004


2. a) 0.510kg x 1000g/1kg= 5.1 x 102g

b) 92 mi x 1.609344km/1mi= 1.48059 x 102 km

c) 0.50m3 x 1 000 000cm3/ 1m3 = 5 x 105 cm3

d) 15μs x 1ms/0.001 μs = 1.5 x 10-2ms

e) 60.0km/1hour = 65000m/3600 sec = 1.805556 x 101 m/s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1e looks reeaall suspicious.

If I multiplied both numbers by 10^7 (for my convenience), I'd see 390.1 + 1.0

I don't have to convert it back to the proper decimal place to see there's a problem with saying 400
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...