How Are Commutation Relations Derived in Quantum Field Theory?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the derivation of commutation relations in quantum field theory, specifically in the context of quantizing a non-interacting spin-0 field. Participants explore the theoretical foundations and motivations behind these relations, their implications for subsequent calculations, and various approaches to understanding them.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the commutation relations can be treated as postulates, which are physically motivated by concepts such as causality and analogies with quantum mechanics.
  • Others propose that these relations can be motivated through momentum space analysis, where finite volume leads to discrete momenta and corresponding creation and annihilation operators.
  • A participant mentions the classical field theory perspective, where the Poisson bracket between a field and its canonical momentum leads to the introduction of operators in quantum mechanics.
  • One participant describes Zee's analogy of a quantum mechanical system represented as a mattress of particles, suggesting that the commutation relations emerge from the limit of discrete systems as the grid spacing approaches zero.
  • Another participant agrees with the effectiveness of Zee's discussion as a "derivation" of the commutation relations for quantum field theories.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the derivation and motivation of the commutation relations, indicating that multiple competing views remain without a clear consensus on a singular derivation method.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the dependence on specific interpretations of causality, the assumptions made in transitioning from classical to quantum descriptions, and the unresolved nature of the derivations presented.

Chopin
Messages
367
Reaction score
13
In Srednicki's book, he discusses quantizing a non-interacting spin-0 field \phi(x) by defining the KG Lagrangian, and then using it to derive the canonical conjugate momentum \pi(x) = \dot{\phi}(x). Then, he states that, by analogy with normal QM, the commutation relations between these fields is:

[\phi(x), \phi(x')] = 0
[\pi(x), \pi(x')] = 0
[\phi(x), \pi(x')] = i\delta^3(x-x')

Can this be derived from anything we know so far, or does it simply have to be taken on faith? These relations are used to derive the commutation relations for the creation/annihilation operators, which in turn allow us to derive the spectrum of the Hamiltonian, so it looks like they form the basis of pretty much everything that follows.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can treat these, formally, as postulates. However, they are physically motivated postulates. For example the first two are related to causality (with the fields all taken at the same time), and the last one is analogous to QM.
 
You can motivate these commutation relations by looking at momentum space. If you have finite volume in position space you get discrete momenta and for each momentum kn you find a pair of creation and annihilation operators like for the harmonic oscillator.

Another way to see that is to look at classical field theory and Poisson brackets in the canonical formalism. For a field and its canonical momentum the Poisson bracket reads

\{\phi(x),\pi(y)\} = \delta(x-y)

Quantizing the fields i.e. replacing them by field operators means just introducing the "i", just like in ordinary QM for the operators x and p.
 
Zee's discussion of this is nice, I think: he considers a QM system like a mattress with a bunch of particles that each have one degree of freedom that are arranged in a discrete grid with nearby particles coupled together with springs or something. Then you take the limit where the grid spacing goes to zero and you get the quantum mechanical description of a continuous field, with those commutation relations emerging as the limit of the commutation relations in the discrete case.
 
The_Duck said:
Zee's discussion of this is nice, I think: he considers a QM system like a mattress with a bunch of particles that each have one degree of freedom that are arranged in a discrete grid with nearby particles coupled together with springs or something. Then you take the limit where the grid spacing goes to zero and you get the quantum mechanical description of a continuous field, with those commutation relations emerging as the limit of the commutation relations in the discrete case.

Yes, this is an excellent "derivation" of the commutation relations for quantum field theories.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K