How Can a Non-Homogeneous 4th Order PDE for Cantilever Beam Vibration Be Solved?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter harsha@iitm
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around solving a non-homogeneous fourth-order partial differential equation (PDE) related to the transverse vibration of a cantilever beam. Participants explore various methods for addressing both the homogeneous and non-homogeneous parts of the equation.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the applicability of the method of separation of variables for the non-homogeneous PDE.
  • Another participant suggests using integral transforms, specifically Laplace and Fourier transforms, to solve the homogeneous equation and hints that this method may also be applicable to the non-homogeneous case.
  • A participant mentions a specific form of the non-homogeneous term, f(x,t) = a√x*(cos(ω₁t) + cos(ω₂t)), and expresses uncertainty about how to find a particular integral for the PDE.
  • Further contributions reference historical figures and texts related to the methods discussed, emphasizing the elegance of the integral transform approach.
  • There is a suggestion to first solve the homogeneous initial value problem before tackling the inhomogeneous terms, with a focus on the relationship between convolution and ordinary product in the context of Fourier transforms.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple approaches to solving the PDE, with no consensus on a single method. There is acknowledgment of the complexity involved in addressing the non-homogeneous part, and various methods are proposed without agreement on which is superior.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the specific conditions and assumptions necessary for applying the discussed methods, particularly in relation to the non-homogeneous term and the initial conditions of the problem.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying partial differential equations, particularly in the context of mechanical vibrations and engineering applications.

harsha@iitm
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone... I'm new to this fourm...Can anyone tell me how a non homogenous 4th order pde can be solved. its a cantilever beam transverse vibration problem. can i use variables seperable? i got solution for homogenous eq... but how abt non homogenous part.

the eq is
[tex]\frac{\partial^4 y(x,t)}{\partial x^4} -A*\frac{\partial^2y(x,t)}{\partial t^2}=f(x,t)[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Two suggestions for homogeneous vibration equation

That's a version of the Euler beam equation... oh, I see you already know that! OK, first try setting f=0 and consider the initial value problem
[tex] y_{tt} = A \, y_{xxxx}, \, y(0,x) = p(x), \; y_t(0,x) = q(x) [/tex]
..oh, I see, you already solved that!

Well for the benefit of others: for an elegant solution using integral transforms, try using Laplace transform (wrt t) then Fourier transform (wrt x), then solve the resulting algebraic equation, then inverse Laplace and inverse Fourier (in that order--- you can think about why this is OK!) This also works in higher dimensions and is a lovely illustration of the power of integral transforms, as is a similar analysis for the usual wave equation. (Unfortunately, in many other examples it is not so easy to find the requisite inverse transforms of the functions which arise in the course of trying to follow this method!) If you are familiar with Lie's method of solving PDEs (even nonlinear PDEs) using internal symmetries, these also provide useful information here and for analogous equations formulated in noneuclidean backgrounds. It can be helpful to observe that by analogy with constructing "conjugate harmonic" solutions (up to additive constant) to the Laplace equation, we can construct "conjugate" solutions to the beam equation (up to a more complicated additive term).

For the inhomogeneous vibration equation, for some f the integral transform approach might still bring joy. And "group analysis" as per Lie will pick out those terms f which yield simpler "point symmetry groups" of the inhomogeneous beam equation; in these cases symmetry approaches (among others) will yield more solutions. What happened when you tried separation of variables? If all else fails, you can look through eqworld.ipmnet.ru/ (seems to be down at time of posting)
 
Last edited:
Thank u very much chris. that was really helpful...i'll try solving it. with variables seperable i dnt know how to solve for particular integral for a pde . f(x,t) in my case is

[tex]f(x,t)= a\sqrt{x}*(cos(\omega_{1}t)+cos(\omega_{2}t))[/tex]

i'll try with laplace and Fourier transforms and let u know if i have any further problem.
 
Last edited:
Green with envy

Oooh, harsha, you lucky fellow, doesn't that (the integral transform method) just work out beautifully?!

I should credit this method of solution to Boussinesq of Boussinesq equation fame from somewhat before (I think) the turn of the last century. I learned about it from the textbook of Graff on nonlinear waves in elastic solids, who I guess learned about it from the famous old textbook of Morse and Feshback, whom I guess learned it from the original paper of Boussinesq. I think the original paper might be cited in the CRC book by Polyanin, who is also the creator of EqWorld.

Harsha, this is such a nice example that now I'm itching to write about it, but I'll restrain myself until you've had a chance to work it out for yourself. Slightly revised hint: first try the homogeneous initial value problem (IVP)
[tex] u_{tt} + a^2 \, u_{xxxx} = 0, \;<br /> u(x,0) = p(x), \; u_t(x,0) = q''(x)[/tex]
(where the reason for the double derivative wrt x in the last equation will become clear when we consider conjugate solutions of the beam equation!) and then start playing with some inhomogeneous terms. The key is to recall the relation between convolution and ordinary product when we evaluate the Fourier transform! Also, to pay attention to domains (we probably want to restrict to [itex]x>0[/itex] for your function, or else cut off to the left). The answer is (if I haven't goofed) a sum of convolutions, the first two terms agreeing with the Boussinesq solution of the homogeneous IVP and the others coming from your f(x,t).

If there are any lurkers out there with a yen to learn about PDEs generally (good for you!), try Ronald W. Guenther and John W. Lee, Partial Differential Equations of Mathematical Physics and Integral Equations, Dover reprint, which has a nice (but more elementary) discussion of the beam equation! An excellent book for integral transforms is Dean G. Duffy, Transform Methods for Solving Partial Differential Equations, CRC, 1994.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K