Undergrad How can concentration gradient field come into existence immediately?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the nature of non-stationary diffusion in a 2D rectangular plane, questioning how concentration gradients can appear simultaneously at all points. It contrasts the perception of diffusion as a series of point-to-point processes with the reality of simultaneous changes across the entire plane. The analogy to electrostatics is explored, highlighting that while electric fields create forces that generate current density, diffusion lacks such forces, relying instead on statistical behavior of particles. The key concern is understanding how concentration gradients can emerge instantaneously without a driving force, suggesting that diffusion should propagate gradually rather than instantaneously. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in questioning the fundamental principles of diffusion.
Dario56
Messages
289
Reaction score
48
TL;DR
How can concentration gradient field come into existence immediately at all points in non-stationary diffusion?
Suppose there is a non-stationary diffusion process in 2D rectangular plane. Component diffuses from the outside through all four faces of the plane.

When I think about the simulations of the non-stationary diffusion in Matlab for example (finite difference numerical solution), I remember how time change in concentration happens simultaneously at all points and concentration gradient also decreases continuously. Diffusion profile becomes flater and flater.

However, when I think about the process in the head, I think about it as the component diffusing from the edge inwards (1st paragraph). It's a process happening in series not parallel where component diffuses from point to point following the concentration gradient and time change in concentration doesn't happen simultaneously at all points. Mole flux and concentration gradient are vectors and therefore defined at the point. Component only knows what is happening at the point and follows the vector field of molar flux from point to point. As the time goes, diffusion progresses deeper and deeper into the sample (diffusion length goes up).

It seems that this picture is incorrect and process actually happens in parallel, simultaneously at all points. What isn't intuitive to me is how can concentration gradient field come into existence immediately at all points? Drawing a parallel with electrostatics can be done where electric field is defined at every point as soon as we apply potential difference between two points. Molar flux is replaced by current density and concentration gradient with electric field. We can think of concentration gradient as some kind of ''chemical force'' field (analogous to electric field - electric force relationship) creating a molar flux (current density).

However, there is no force here in reality and that's the reason why the analogy with electrostatics doesn't actually work. It's just statistics and probability theory applied to the large collection of randomly moving particles. In electrostatics, electric force acts on charges creating current density. This force (and electric field) decreases with the distance squared (inverse square law). There is no any such force in diffusion acting on particles and creating molar flux. In that sense, if the concentration gradients don't exist initially inside the sample, how can they suddenly come into existence everywhere when diffusion starts? Diffusion molar fluxes don't arise from interaction unlike electric currents created by electric fields. My picture is that they need to be created at some points and then propagate through space as time goes.

As there is no force here, diffusion should propagate point to point, following the concentration gradient field and there can't be simultaneous time change in concentration at all points.

What am I missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Diffusion is not instantaneous. Concentration gradients occur only because the are imposed by other degrees of freedom in the system . You need to ask your questions more succinctly.....the preamble you supply is just confusing. Number the questions if possible (no more than 3 per customer, please)
 
I'm not a student or graduate in Astrophysics.. Wish i were though... I was playing with distances between planets... I found that Mars, Ceres, Jupiter and Saturn have somthing in common... They are in a kind of ratio with another.. They all got a difference about 1,84 to 1,88x the distance from the previous planet, sub-planet. On average 1,845x. I thought this can be coincidential. So i took the big moons of Jupiter and Saturn to do the same thing jupiter; Io, Europa and Ganymede have a...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K