How can I evaluate the carrying capacity of a quadruped/hexapod robot?

  • Thread starter Thread starter theycallmevirgo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacity Robot
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the carrying capacity of quadruped and hexapod robots, focusing on the mechanical design, servo requirements, and load distribution. Participants explore theoretical and practical aspects of robotic leg mechanics, including torque calculations and stability during movement.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how to predict the carrying capacity and whether all servos need to be powered constantly to maintain stability.
  • Another participant suggests that there is no single equation for the problem and emphasizes the need for a geometric model of the mechanical linkage and load distribution.
  • A participant mentions the importance of the number of degrees of freedom in each leg, which affects balance and stability during movement.
  • One participant expresses skepticism about the mechanical design of a specific robot, suggesting it may lack controlled leg movement due to its linkage configuration.
  • Several participants discuss the need for diagrams and detailed specifications of the robot's linkage and servo torque to further the analysis.
  • Resources, including books and articles on walking robots, are shared, with one participant noting a specific chapter that may be helpful despite being in Polish.
  • Another participant explains that the vertical movement of the legs is controlled by servos, which will reach a stall torque limit as weight is added to the chassis, affecting movement and control.
  • Concerns are raised about the strength and rigidity of the legs under lateral loads when walking on uneven surfaces with added weight.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the mechanical design and operational capabilities of the robots, with no consensus reached on specific design equations or the effectiveness of certain configurations. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal approach to evaluate carrying capacity.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in their discussions, such as the need for specific torque specifications and the dependency on the geometric model of the robot's design. There are also references to unresolved mathematical steps in the analysis of the robot's carrying capacity.

theycallmevirgo
Messages
108
Reaction score
25
TL;DR
How many legs must defeat overall mg at the same time to allow for motion?
How can I predict carrying capacity of something like this ?

Capture.PNG


or this?

1606774318392.png


Clearly some combination of servos must defeat mg, but how many? Do all of them need to be powered constantly, whether any leg is moving or not, just to "stand up straight"?

Further, each leg is clearly a lever. What is the design equation to maximize vertical force?Many thanks in advance for any help

Joe
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
There is no single equation that will answer your question. You will need to define a geometric model of the mechanical linkage. Motor force will be transmitted through those links to become a vertical force on the ground.

You will also need to specify how the mass load is distributed over the vehicle chassis.

The number of degrees of freedom in each leg will decide how many feet may remain on the ground while walking. So there may be several modes of operation, some of which may lead to balance or stability problems. Taking shorter steps may support greater loads.

Can you draw a diagram of the linkage that defines one leg?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
Sorry if I have to do this piecemeal, but I may lose network soon. To answer one of your questions immediately, safe to assume a fairly even horizontal load distribution. Maybe slightly more in the center.

I can easily do a fairly detailed diagram of the linkage. Do you prefer I make a separate reply or edit this one?
 
I'm not convinced that blue contraption has any capability of controlled leg movement.

I see only two arms per leg, both attaching to a single axle (i.e. mechanically, it's just one arm with a redundant arm), so Ill bet if it really existed, it would just fall flat.Contrast with the wooden one, which correctly has two arms, each with its own attachment point.


Never mind. I just noticed that Blue's legs have a motors that their knees.
 
DaveC426913 said:
I'm not convinced that blue contraption has any capability of controlled leg movement.

I see only two arms per leg, both attaching to a single axle (i.e. mechanically, it's just one arm with a redundant arm), so Ill bet if it really existed, it would just fall flat.Contrast with the wooden one, which correctly has two arms, each with its own attachment point.


Never mind. I just noticed that Blue's legs have a motors that their knees.
They all have motors in their knees.
 
theycallmevirgo said:
I can easily do a fairly detailed diagram of the linkage. Do you prefer I make a separate reply or edit this one?
Keep the discussion in this thread. Post your diagram here.

We need to know the length of links between pins and from pins to the tips of the feet. Do you have torque specifications for the actuator servos ?
 
I have a book about walking robots and it features various design calculations (including evaluation of necessary torque and power) but it's in Polish, unfortunately. However, there are some articles and boook chapters that can be useful for you. For example check the "Design of Hexapod Walking Robots: Background and Challenges" chapter of the book titled "Handbook of Research on Advancements in Robotics and Mechatronics".
 
FEAnalyst said:
I have a book about walking robots and it features various design calculations (including evaluation of necessary torque and power) but it's in Polish, unfortunately. However, there are some articles and boook chapters that can be useful for you. For example check the "Design of Hexapod Walking Robots: Background and Challenges" chapter of the book titled "Handbook of Research on Advancements in Robotics and Mechatronics".

Thanks, will google
 
FEAnalyst said:
I have a book about walking robots and it features various design calculations (including evaluation of necessary torque and power) but it's in Polish, unfortunately. However, there are some articles and boook chapters that can be useful for you. For example check the "Design of Hexapod Walking Robots: Background and Challenges" chapter of the book titled "Handbook of Research on Advancements in Robotics and Mechatronics".
Actually I am (fluent in) Russian so I may possibly be able to make my way through polish. Is it softcopy?
 
  • #10
  • #11
I found two books in English, on the subject of walking robots, edited Teresa Zielińska.

Romansy 16: Robot Design, Dynamics, and Control [1 ed.]
Atsuo Takanishi (auth.), Teresa Zielińska, Cezary Zieliński (eds.)
CISM Courses and Lectures 487
ISBN: 978-3-211-36064-4, 978-3-211-38927-0, 3-211-36064-6
Springer-Verlag Wien 2006 [463 pages] English

Walking: Biological and Technological Aspects [1 ed.]
Friedrich Pfeiffer, Teresa Zielinska (eds.)
International Centre for Mechanical Sciences 467
ISBN: 978-3-211-22134-1, 978-3-7091-2772-8
Springer-Verlag Wien 2004 [194 pages] English
 
  • #12
As you can see from the picture, the vertical position and movement of each leg is controlled by one servo, which arm is anchored to the lower linkage.
If you gradually add weight to the chassis of the robot, a point will be reached at which the stall torque value of the four servos will stop further control and movement of the legs.

Please, see:
https://www.societyofrobots.com/actuators_servos.shtml#digitalanalogservos

Common servos don't have any self-locking mechanism, reason for which, the motors of these four servos will be using as many amps as needed to compensate for the required torque to keep each leg at certain height (at least while walking).

That is not the case for the four servos controling the radial position and movement of the legs, but increasing weight on the chassis will also increase friction on those horizontal linkages, requiring additional output torques and input Amps.

If walking on non-flat surfaces with extra weight loaded chassis, the strength and rigidity of the legs and linkages under lateral loads should be considered.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: theycallmevirgo
  • #13
Lnewqban said:
As you can see from the picture, the vertical position and movement of each leg is controlled by one servo, which arm is anchored to the lower linkage.
If you gradually add weight to the chassis of the robot, a point will be reached at which the stall torque value of the four servos will stop further control and movement of the legs.

Please, see:
https://www.societyofrobots.com/actuators_servos.shtml#digitalanalogservos

Common servos don't have any self-locking mechanism, reason for which, the motors of these four servos will be using as many amps as needed to compensate for the required torque to keep each leg at certain height (at least while walking).

That is not the case for the four servos controling the radial position and movement of the legs, but increasing weight on the chassis will also increase friction on those horizontal linkages, requiring additional output torques and input Amps.

If walking on non-flat surfaces with extra weight loaded chassis, the strength and rigidity of the legs and linkages under lateral loads should be considered.
Thanks so much for this, I think I will test experimentally based on your suggestions and follow up with any additional questions.
 
  • #14
theycallmevirgo said:
Thanks so much for this, I think I will test experimentally based on your suggestions and follow up with any additional questions.
You are welcome. :smile:
Best luck with the project.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
118K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K