How can I find the characteristic function of a bivariate gaussian distribution?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the characteristic function of a bivariate Gaussian distribution, highlighting the challenge of integrating the Gaussian density function. The user encounters difficulties while attempting to simplify a double integral involving the joint density function and substitutions for the variables. They express frustration over not being able to complete the square due to the correlation coefficient's presence. Suggestions include using transformations to eliminate cross-product terms. The conversation emphasizes the complexity of the problem and the need for alternative methods beyond those found in existing resources.
steven187
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

Im currently researching into Multivariate distributions, in particular I am trying to derive the characteristic function of the bivariate distribution of a gaussian. While knowing that a gaussian density function cannot be integrated how is it possible to find the characteristic function. I have been working on it but I keep bumping into a dead end. The following is what I did in the most recent dead end: (does anybody know why the latex thing aint working? I havnt been on here for a while)

so I have a double integral of the

exp{i*x*t_x+i*y*t_y}*(joint density function)

then I did the substitutions
u=x-m_x
and
v=y-m_y

I then simplified it down such that I get the following in the exponential expression

u^2*s_y^2-2*(si)*u*v*s_x*s_y+v^2*s_x^2

where si is the correlation coefficient, the problem is I can't complete the square because of the existence of si, would anybody know what I would need to do?

I had looked at Wolfram Mathworld website, its very interesting how it uses Eulers formula but isn't there any other way of doing it?

Regards

Steven
 
Physics news on Phys.org
let w=au+bv and z=bu-av, where a^2+b^2=1. There will be some value of a where there will not be a cross product term for wz. Good luck!
 
The standard _A " operator" maps a Null Hypothesis Ho into a decision set { Do not reject:=1 and reject :=0}. In this sense ( HA)_A , makes no sense. Since H0, HA aren't exhaustive, can we find an alternative operator, _A' , so that ( H_A)_A' makes sense? Isn't Pearson Neyman related to this? Hope I'm making sense. Edit: I was motivated by a superficial similarity of the idea with double transposition of matrices M, with ## (M^{T})^{T}=M##, and just wanted to see if it made sense to talk...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
6K