How can I integrate 1/(sin x + sec x)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter velliyangiri
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrate Sin
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves integrating the function 1/(sin x + sec x), which falls under the subject area of calculus, specifically integral calculus. Participants express curiosity about the complexity of the integral and share various attempts at finding a solution.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss different substitution methods, including the use of trigonometric identities and rational algebraic expressions. Some express frustration with the complexity of the integral, while others suggest alternative approaches and question the assumptions behind the integrand's form.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with several participants offering insights and suggestions for substitutions. There is a recognition of the integral's complexity, and while some guidance has been provided, no consensus has been reached on a definitive method or solution.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the potential for higher-degree terms arising from substitutions, and there is mention of the need for partial fraction decomposition. The original poster's attempts and the nature of the integral have led to a variety of interpretations and methods being explored.

velliyangiri
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


∫ 1 /( sin x + sec x) dx


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


∫ cos x / ( sin x + cos x ) style question
Tried ∫ cos x / (sin x . cos x + 1) dx
and uses sin 2x
tried substitutions
nothing seem to work

 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm really curious to see if anyone can get this one. I plotted the graph and it looks very strange.. Please post the solution when you find it, it would help me sleep at night.
 
You can always reduce it to an integral with rational algebraic expressions with the substitution:
[tex] t \equiv \tan \left( \frac{x}{2} \right)[/tex]

[tex] \sin x = \frac{2 t}{1 + t^2}, \ \cos x = \frac{1 - t^2}{1 + t^2}, \ dx = \frac{2 \, dt}{1 + t^2}[/tex]
 
Dickfore said:
You can always reduce it to an integral with rational algebraic expressions with the substitution:
[tex] t \equiv \tan \left( \frac{x}{2} \right)[/tex]

[tex] \sin x = \frac{2 t}{1 + t^2}, \ \cos x = \frac{1 - t^2}{1 + t^2}, \ dx = \frac{2 \, dt}{1 + t^2}[/tex]

man, i wish i knew how to do this back in the day. . .
 
Dickfore said:
You can always reduce it to an integral with rational algebraic expressions with the substitution:
[tex] t \equiv \tan \left( \frac{x}{2} \right)[/tex]

[tex] \sin x = \frac{2 t}{1 + t^2}, \ \cos x = \frac{1 - t^2}{1 + t^2}, \ dx = \frac{2 \, dt}{1 + t^2}[/tex]

I can't see that being much easier because after playing with the algebra it's going to leave many t's with various higher degrees (up to 6th degree if my algebra is correct) and also in a fraction form. After plugging back in tan it's going to have some subs and then reduction formulas for those higher degrees.
 
and this is exactly why the output from Wolfram Alpha looks that long. The only difference is that the imaginary unit is missing and instead of inverse hyperbolic, you'll have inverse trigonometric functions.

No one said the result should have a simple form. Given the integrand, no other simpler substitution seems possible. But, you need to do the partial fraction decomposition yourself, or at least bring the integral in a rational algebraic form if you want further help.
 
You could try something like this:
\begin{align*}
\frac{1}{\sin x + \sec x} &= \frac{1}{\sin x + \sec x} \cdot \frac{\sin x - \sec x}{\sin x - \sec x} \\
&= \frac{\sin x - \sec x}{\sin^2 x - \sec^2 x} \\
&= \frac{\cos^2 x\sin x - \cos x}{\cos^2 x\ \sin^2 x - 1} \\
&= \frac{\cos^2 x}{\cos^2 x\ (1-\cos^2 x) - 1}\sin x - \frac{1}{(1-\sin^2 x)\sin^2 x - 1}\cos x
\end{align*}Then use a trig substitution for each of the two terms.
 
  • #10
Dickfore said:
No one said the result should have a simple form. Given the integrand, no other simpler substitution seems possible. But, you need to do the partial fraction decomposition yourself, or at least bring the integral in a rational algebraic form if you want further help.

Yeah I know what you mean, it's just that the integral just looked deceiving simple at first glance. :smile:
 
  • #11
DrummingAtom said:
Lol.. Oh my..

There has to be an easier way to get this one.
There is.

Use the fact that cos(-pi/4) = sin(-pi/4)=1/√2 .

[tex]\begin{aligned}<br /> \sin x + \cos x &= \sqrt2 \left(\cos x\frac 1 {\sqrt2} + \sin x \frac 1 {\sqrt2}\right) \\<br /> &= \sqrt2 (\cos x \cos(\pi/4) + \sin x \sin (\pi/4)) \\<br /> &= \sqrt2 \cos(x-\pi/4)<br /> \end{aligned}[/tex]

And thus [itex]1/(\sin x + \cos x) = \sec(x-\pi/4)/\sqrt 2[/itex]


So now all you have to do is find the integral of sec(x-pi/4) and then divide by √2.
 
  • #12
the only problem is that the denominator is [itex]\sin x + \sec x[/itex], and not [itex]\sin x + \cos x[/itex] as you were trying to simplify.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K