How can I simplify a PDE with variable coefficients?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter vargasjc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interesting
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the simplification and solution of a partial differential equation (PDE) with variable coefficients. Participants explore methods to approach the problem, including potential transformations and numerical solutions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • JC expresses difficulty in simplifying the PDE and is unsure how to proceed with the variables involved.
  • One participant questions whether both x and m are unknown functions, seeking clarification on the problem setup.
  • Another participant suggests that the equation can be rewritten in a simpler form, which may facilitate finding a solution.
  • JC acknowledges that the suggested transformation helped in solving the equation but indicates that the solution was unexpected, prompting a reconsideration of the problem formulation.
  • JC mentions that the resulting equation is a variable coefficient wave equation and expresses skepticism about finding a closed-form solution, indicating a shift towards seeking numerical solutions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best approach to the problem, as there are differing views on the nature of the solution and the methods to be employed.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the nature of the functions x and m, as well as the implications of the variable coefficients in the PDE.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in solving partial differential equations, particularly those with variable coefficients, as well as those exploring numerical methods for such problems.

vargasjc
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
I have spent hours and hours trying to solve a problem until reaching a dead point. I don't know how to solve, simplify, or proceed next with the following PDE:

[tex]m \frac{\partial^2 x}{\partial t^2} + 2 \frac{\partial m}{\partial t} \frac{\partial x}{\partial t} + x \frac{\partial^2 m}{\partial t^2}=0[/tex]

Or, in other words: mx_tt + 2m_tx_t + xm_tt = 0

[tex]m x_{tt} + 2 m_{t} x_{t} + x m_{tt}[/tex]

I thought it'd be easier but I don't seem to be able to simplify it. Maybe it is a form I don't recognize.

JC
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are you trying to solve for? x and m are both unknown functions?
 
Your equation can be written as:

[tex]\frac{\partial ^2(m x)}{\partial t^2}=0[/tex]

And this can be solved easily. Hope it helps you.
 
Thanks.

It helped me solve the differential equation, and it also made me realize that the solution is not what I expected it to be. I believe I need to revisit the formulation.

Thanks again,

JC
 
You are welcome. Update us with your problem if you want.
 
I've ended up with a variable coefficient wave equation, so I'm browsing for numerical solutions of similar problems at ScienceDirect.

A closed form solution at this point is like asking Santa Claus for Dominion Over the Universe (yeah, um... not going to happen).

JC
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K