How can I solve the 2nd order PDE for \beta^{(0)} in geochemical thermodynamics?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter presentt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2nd order Pde
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the second-order partial differential equation (PDE) for the function \(\beta^{(0)}\) in geochemical thermodynamics, specifically under constant pressure conditions. The equations provided include \(\beta^{(0)L}\) and \(\beta^{(0)J}\), which are derivatives of \(\beta^{(0)}\) with respect to temperature \(T\). The empirical expression for \(\beta^{(0)J}\) incorporates constants \(U_5\), \(U_6\), \(U_7\), and \(U_8\) and requires integration techniques to derive \(\beta^{(0)}\). The proposed method involves decomposing terms and using integration factors to simplify the integration process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of second-order partial differential equations (PDEs)
  • Familiarity with thermodynamic properties and equations of state
  • Knowledge of integration techniques, including integration by parts and substitution
  • Experience with empirical constants in thermodynamic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study methods for solving second-order PDEs in thermodynamics
  • Learn about the Hermite theorem for decomposing complex terms
  • Explore integration techniques for functions involving logarithmic and polynomial terms
  • Research the application of empirical constants in thermodynamic modeling
USEFUL FOR

Researchers and practitioners in geochemistry, thermodynamics, and applied mathematics, particularly those involved in modeling and solving complex thermodynamic equations.

presentt
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi, I've spent days trying to solve some equations in a paper (referenced below) that describes it as a "straightforward, albeit lengthy integration," but I can't work out the "straightforward" bit. The notation is also odd, which doesn't seem to help my problem. Perhaps someone could help?

I am trying to solve for the function \beta^{(0)}, which is a function of T and P (though P is held constant). Ultimately, I need a value of \beta^{(0)} at a specific temperature T.

I am given in the paper:
\beta^{(0)L}=(\frac{\partial\beta^{(0)}}{\partial T})_{P}
\beta^{(0)J}=(\frac{\partial\beta^{(0)L}}{\partial T})_{P}+(2/T)\beta^{(0)L}

Also given,
\beta^{(0)J}=6U_{5}+\frac{2U_{6}}{T}+\frac{U_{7}}{T^{2}}+\frac{526U_{8}}{T(T-263)^{3}}
where the U values are empirical constants.

I (think) I managed to solve the following expression for \beta^{(0)}:
\beta^{(0)}=\int\beta^{(0)J}\frac{T}{1+2ln(T)}\partial T
but I cannot figure out how to integrate that expression.

Thus, I also tried to express the functions as a PDE:
\beta^{(0)J}=(\frac{\partial^{2}\beta^{(0)}}{\partial T^{2}})_{P}+\frac{2}{T}(\frac{\partial\beta^{(0)}}{\partial T})_{P}
and then substitute the U-series empirical expression of \beta^{(0)J} and subtract it from each side. However, I am as at much of a loss to solve that expression for \beta^{(0)} as the integral expression above.

Can anyone help me out at all? These equations are important to work out some geochemical thermodynamics I need to set up an experiment.

Reference:
Rogers, P. S. Z. and Pitzer, K. S., High-Temperature Thermodynamic Properties of Aqueous Sodium-Sulfate Solutions. Journal of Physical Chemistry 85 (20), 2886 (1981).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
presentt said:
a "straightforward, albeit lengthy integration,"

In fact, the method that comes into my mind is VERY lenghty:

1) First, decompose the T(T-263)^3 term with Hermite theorem:

\frac{526U_8}{T(T-263)^3}=\frac{a_1}{T}+\frac{a_2}{(T-263)^3}+\frac{a_3}{(T-263)^2}+\frac{a_4}{(T-263)}

To find the coefficients a_1 match the two sides, you should find (I made the calculations very quickly, so I don't guarantee that's correct)

a_1=-\frac{526U_8}{(263)^3}

a_2=\frac{526U_8}{263}

a_3=-\frac{526U_8}{(263)^2}

a_4=\frac{2\cdot 526U_8}{(263)^3}

2) Now try the ansatz:

\beta^{(0)L}=b_1T+b_2+b_3\log T+b_4/T+b_5/T^2+b_6/(T-263)+b_7/(T-263)^2+b_8/(T-263)^3

Calculate the derivative of this and substitute into the differential equation for \beta^{(0)L}, finding in this way the coefficients b_i.

3) Finally, to find \beta^{(0)J}, simply integrate, which should be simple because \beta^{(0)L} is a sum of things easy to integrate.

4) I'm afraid this procedure will cost you half a day...!
 
presentt said:
\beta^{(0)L}=(\frac{\partial\beta^{(0)}}{\partial T})_{P}
\beta^{(0)J}=(\frac{\partial\beta^{(0)L}}{\partial T})_{P}+(2/T)\beta^{(0)L}

Multiply the second equation by an integrating factor \mu(T), demanding that the right hand side is of the product rule form u v' + u' v. This gives an easy DE for mu, but you can also just check that \mu = T^2 will work. You thus have

T^2 \beta^{(0)J} = \frac{\partial}{\partial T}(T^2\beta^{(0)L}).

Integrating,

\beta^{(0)L}(T,P) = \left(\frac{T_0}{T}\right)^2\beta^{(0)L}(T_0,P) + \frac{1}{T^2} \int_{T_0}^T dt~t^2 \beta^{(0)J}(t)
where the pressure dependence enters as the initial condition on beta^L.

Since \beta^{(0)L} is just a derivative of \beta^{(0)}, you can just integrate again,

\beta^{(0)}(T,P) = \beta^{(0)}(T_0,P) + T_0^2\beta^{(0)L}(T_0,P)\left(\frac{1}{T_0}-\frac{1}{T}\right) + \int_{T_0}^T \frac{d\tau}{\tau^2}~\int_{T_0}^\tau dt~t^2 \beta^{(0)J}(t)

This might not be the most pleasant set of integrals to do, but it looks like they should be doable in closed form.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K