MHB How can I solve the equation ln(x)/ln(x/y)=e^7 using mathematical methods?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lkcl
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the equation ln(x)/ln(x/y)=e^7, which a user encountered while working with a program called ries. They express confusion over the equation's structure, particularly how to isolate x and y. A participant provides a solution, showing that y can be expressed in terms of x as y = x^(1 - e^(-7)). The conversation also highlights the importance of understanding logarithmic properties and correcting misconceptions about the equation's validity. Overall, the thread emphasizes mathematical manipulation and learning through problem-solving.
lkcl
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
dear all,

my apologies if this is the wrong location to post, i am a software engineer whose maths was at A and S-Level back in 1987. i am on the exciting but empirical (iterative) track of the electron's magnetic moment: using a program called ries i have an *exact* matching equation - details are here if anyone'e interested -
Physics Discussion Forum ? View topic - [RFC] mass of electron to measured accuracy to date

the problem is that ries generates its solutions in LHS and RHS randomly, LHS is in terms of x, RHS is not. the equation is:

ln(x)/ln(x/y)=e^7

or, actually, ries came out with it as:

ln(x^(e^7)) / ln(x) = 1/(e^7)

and i need to solve that. it looks to me like it's "log (in base x) of x itself divided by a constant equals a constant!" which is... crazed :)

is there actually a mathematical solution to this, or would it be necessary to use iteration (again)?

thank you for any help.

l.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
achh, i fear this may have been down to a range error in the double-precision floating point of standard computer maths libraries. the left hand side 0.16^e^7 is veeery small (3e-3000)
 
lkcl said:
dear all,

my apologies if this is the wrong location to post, i am a software engineer whose maths was at A and S-Level back in 1987. i am on the exciting but empirical (iterative) track of the electron's magnetic moment: using a program called ries i have an *exact* matching equation - details are here if anyone'e interested -
Physics Discussion Forum ? View topic - [RFC] mass of electron to measured accuracy to date

the problem is that ries generates its solutions in LHS and RHS randomly, LHS is in terms of x, RHS is not. the equation is:

ln(x)/ln(x/y)=e^7

or, actually, ries came out with it as:

ln(x^(e^7)) / ln(x) = 1/(e^7)

and i need to solve that. it looks to me like it's "log (in base x) of x itself divided by a constant equals a constant!" which is... crazed :)

is there actually a mathematical solution to this, or would it be necessary to use iteration (again)?

thank you for any help.

l.

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \frac{\ln{(x)}}{\ln{ \left( \frac{x}{y} \right) }} &= e^7 \\ \frac{\ln{(x)}}{\ln{(x)} - \ln{(y)}} &= e^7 \\ \ln{(x)} &= e^7 \left[ \ln{(x)} - \ln{(y)} \right] \\ \ln{(x)} &= e^7\ln{(x)} - e^7\ln{(y)} \\ e^7\ln{(y)} &= e^7\ln{(x)} - \ln{(x)} \\ e^7\ln{(y)} &= \left( e^7 - 1 \right) \ln{(x)} \\ \ln{(y)} &= \left( \frac{e^7 - 1}{e^7} \right) \ln{(x)} \\ \ln{(y)} &= \left( 1 - e^{-7} \right) \ln{(x)} \\ \ln{(y)} &= \ln{ \left( x ^{1 - e^{-7}} \right) } \\ y &= x^{ 1 - e^{-7}} \end{align*}$
 
Hello lkcl and welcome to MHB! :D

I have moved this thread as it's really a problem in elementary rather than linear or abstract algebra.

Prove It has provided a solution to the first equation, for $y$ in terms of $x$. Now the second equation you gave is not an identity as it implies $$e^7=e^{-7}$$.

To show this consider:

$$\frac{\ln\left(x^{e^7} \right)}{\ln(x)}=\frac{1}{e^7}$$

Now, to the numerator on the left, we may apply the logarithmic property:

$$\log_a\left(b^c \right)=c\cdot\log_a(b)$$ to obtain:

$$\frac{e^7\ln(x)}{\ln(x)}=\frac{1}{e^7}$$

Dividing out common factors on the left, we have:

$$e^7=\frac{1}{e^7}$$

And we may rewrite the right side using a negative exponent:

$$e^7=e^{-7}$$

Thus, the given equation is not true, however, the following are true:

$$\frac{\ln\left(x^{e^7} \right)}{\ln(x)}=e^7$$

or

$$\frac{\ln\left(x^{e^{-7}} \right)}{\ln(x)}=\frac{1}{e^7}$$

This is a result of:

$$y=\frac{\ln\left(x^{y} \right)}{\ln(x)}$$

We could also view this using the change of base formula $$\frac{\log_a(b)}{\log_a(c)}=\log_c(b)$$ to write:

$$\frac{\ln\left(x^{y} \right)}{\ln(x)}=\log_x\left(x^y \right)=y\log_x(x)=y\cdot1=y$$
 
hallo, hallo, thanks for the welcome - yes this is one of those things that i am floundering around with, taking on far more than i can chew, but patiently making progess. ries - amazing program RIES - Find Algebraic Equations, Given Their Solution at MROB - has a few bugs. although its developer has clearly sorted out various bugs removing things like "1=1" or "x/x", finding things like ln(x)/ln(x/y)=y as a "solution" are much harder to.. to... not come up with. as this was the first time i used ries, i didn't know it could make that kind of mistake.

but, here's the good news: thanks to the two posts, i learned about how to manipulate algebraic logarithm equations :) for that i am extremely grateful.

p.s. "Living in the pools, They soon forget about the sea...— Rush, "Natural Science" (1980)" - great album! love jacob's ladder.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top