How can I solve the equation ln(x)/ln(x/y)=e^7 using mathematical methods?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter lkcl
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the equation ln(x)/ln(x/y)=e^7 using mathematical methods. Participants explore the implications of the equation, its derivation, and potential solutions, including iterative approaches and algebraic manipulations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about the mathematical solution to the equation and questions whether iteration is necessary.
  • Another participant suggests that a range error in floating-point calculations might affect the results, particularly noting the small value of 0.16^e^7.
  • A participant provides a detailed algebraic manipulation of the equation, leading to a derived expression for y in terms of x, but also points out that the second equation presented is not an identity.
  • There is a discussion about the properties of logarithms and how they can be applied to the equation, including the change of base formula.
  • A participant reflects on their learning experience regarding algebraic logarithm equations and acknowledges the complexity of the problem.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether a straightforward mathematical solution exists, and there are competing views on the validity of the derived equations and their implications.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note potential limitations in the computational methods used and the accuracy of the results generated by the software, as well as the complexity of the algebraic manipulations involved.

lkcl
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
dear all,

my apologies if this is the wrong location to post, i am a software engineer whose maths was at A and S-Level back in 1987. i am on the exciting but empirical (iterative) track of the electron's magnetic moment: using a program called ries i have an *exact* matching equation - details are here if anyone'e interested -
Physics Discussion Forum ? View topic - [RFC] mass of electron to measured accuracy to date

the problem is that ries generates its solutions in LHS and RHS randomly, LHS is in terms of x, RHS is not. the equation is:

ln(x)/ln(x/y)=e^7

or, actually, ries came out with it as:

ln(x^(e^7)) / ln(x) = 1/(e^7)

and i need to solve that. it looks to me like it's "log (in base x) of x itself divided by a constant equals a constant!" which is... crazed :)

is there actually a mathematical solution to this, or would it be necessary to use iteration (again)?

thank you for any help.

l.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
achh, i fear this may have been down to a range error in the double-precision floating point of standard computer maths libraries. the left hand side 0.16^e^7 is veeery small (3e-3000)
 
lkcl said:
dear all,

my apologies if this is the wrong location to post, i am a software engineer whose maths was at A and S-Level back in 1987. i am on the exciting but empirical (iterative) track of the electron's magnetic moment: using a program called ries i have an *exact* matching equation - details are here if anyone'e interested -
Physics Discussion Forum ? View topic - [RFC] mass of electron to measured accuracy to date

the problem is that ries generates its solutions in LHS and RHS randomly, LHS is in terms of x, RHS is not. the equation is:

ln(x)/ln(x/y)=e^7

or, actually, ries came out with it as:

ln(x^(e^7)) / ln(x) = 1/(e^7)

and i need to solve that. it looks to me like it's "log (in base x) of x itself divided by a constant equals a constant!" which is... crazed :)

is there actually a mathematical solution to this, or would it be necessary to use iteration (again)?

thank you for any help.

l.

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \frac{\ln{(x)}}{\ln{ \left( \frac{x}{y} \right) }} &= e^7 \\ \frac{\ln{(x)}}{\ln{(x)} - \ln{(y)}} &= e^7 \\ \ln{(x)} &= e^7 \left[ \ln{(x)} - \ln{(y)} \right] \\ \ln{(x)} &= e^7\ln{(x)} - e^7\ln{(y)} \\ e^7\ln{(y)} &= e^7\ln{(x)} - \ln{(x)} \\ e^7\ln{(y)} &= \left( e^7 - 1 \right) \ln{(x)} \\ \ln{(y)} &= \left( \frac{e^7 - 1}{e^7} \right) \ln{(x)} \\ \ln{(y)} &= \left( 1 - e^{-7} \right) \ln{(x)} \\ \ln{(y)} &= \ln{ \left( x ^{1 - e^{-7}} \right) } \\ y &= x^{ 1 - e^{-7}} \end{align*}$
 
Hello lkcl and welcome to MHB! :D

I have moved this thread as it's really a problem in elementary rather than linear or abstract algebra.

Prove It has provided a solution to the first equation, for $y$ in terms of $x$. Now the second equation you gave is not an identity as it implies $$e^7=e^{-7}$$.

To show this consider:

$$\frac{\ln\left(x^{e^7} \right)}{\ln(x)}=\frac{1}{e^7}$$

Now, to the numerator on the left, we may apply the logarithmic property:

$$\log_a\left(b^c \right)=c\cdot\log_a(b)$$ to obtain:

$$\frac{e^7\ln(x)}{\ln(x)}=\frac{1}{e^7}$$

Dividing out common factors on the left, we have:

$$e^7=\frac{1}{e^7}$$

And we may rewrite the right side using a negative exponent:

$$e^7=e^{-7}$$

Thus, the given equation is not true, however, the following are true:

$$\frac{\ln\left(x^{e^7} \right)}{\ln(x)}=e^7$$

or

$$\frac{\ln\left(x^{e^{-7}} \right)}{\ln(x)}=\frac{1}{e^7}$$

This is a result of:

$$y=\frac{\ln\left(x^{y} \right)}{\ln(x)}$$

We could also view this using the change of base formula $$\frac{\log_a(b)}{\log_a(c)}=\log_c(b)$$ to write:

$$\frac{\ln\left(x^{y} \right)}{\ln(x)}=\log_x\left(x^y \right)=y\log_x(x)=y\cdot1=y$$
 
hallo, hallo, thanks for the welcome - yes this is one of those things that i am floundering around with, taking on far more than i can chew, but patiently making progess. ries - amazing program RIES - Find Algebraic Equations, Given Their Solution at MROB - has a few bugs. although its developer has clearly sorted out various bugs removing things like "1=1" or "x/x", finding things like ln(x)/ln(x/y)=y as a "solution" are much harder to.. to... not come up with. as this was the first time i used ries, i didn't know it could make that kind of mistake.

but, here's the good news: thanks to the two posts, i learned about how to manipulate algebraic logarithm equations :) for that i am extremely grateful.

p.s. "Living in the pools, They soon forget about the sea...— Rush, "Natural Science" (1980)" - great album! love jacob's ladder.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K