How can one build a non-trivial operator with a zero mean value?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the possibility of constructing a non-trivial operator that has a mean value of zero. Participants explore the implications of such an operator, particularly in relation to its dependence on the state of the system and the nature of operators in quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that if an operator has a constant mean value, it must be expressible as a constant times the identity operator, leading to the conclusion that it would be trivial if that constant is zero.
  • Others argue against this by providing examples of operators that can yield a zero mean value without being trivial, such as a specific differential operator.
  • A participant questions the ambiguity of the term "always," suggesting that it could refer to time invariance or state invariance, which could affect the interpretation of the operator's mean value.
  • Some participants assert that only operators that commute with the Hamiltonian can maintain a constant mean value over time, implying that such operators are limited to the Hamiltonian itself or constants.
  • There is mention of constructing new operators by subtracting the mean value from an existing operator to achieve a zero mean value.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of operators with zero mean values, with no consensus reached on whether a non-trivial operator can exist under these conditions. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of state and time dependence on the mean value of operators.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of clarity on the definitions of "always" in relation to operators and the assumptions made about the nature of operators in quantum mechanics. The discussion also reflects varying interpretations of the implications of Hermitian operators and their eigenvalues.

luxxio
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
it is possible to build a non trivial operator which the mean value is always zero?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That would mean it's mean value is always a constant. In other words, it's outcome doesn't depend on the state of the system. That means the operator can be written as a constant times the identity operator.

So you automatically end up with the trivial operator.
 
xepma said:
That would mean it's mean value is always a constant.
no. a constant will not return a zero mean value.
 
I was referring to the more general case: what does it mean to have an operator O which always has a mean value equal to some constant C?

That means that <O> = C, irrespective of the state. Therefore, the operator can be represented by a the constant C times the identity opeator 1, so O = C*1. This leas to:

<O> = C<1> = C, which is what we desire.

You're asking for the special case when C=0. This automatically leads to the trivial operator 0.
 
xepma said:
I was referring to the more general case: what does it mean to have an operator O which always has a mean value equal to some constant C?

That means that <O> = C, irrespective of the state. Therefore, the operator can be represented by a the constant C times the identity opeator 1, so O = C*1. This leas to:

<O> = C<1> = C, which is what we desire.

You're asking for the special case when C=0. This automatically leads to the trivial operator 0.
this is not true. a little example:
the operator [itex]\left[-i\partial_t-\nabla^2 + cost]|\psi>=0[\itex].<br /> so it's mean value is zero[/itex]
 
your question is ambiguous in that you don't specify what you mean by "always". "Always" as in for any time, or as in any state?

if the former then I think xepma has it right. certainly right if the operator is Hermitian, as you just go into the diagonal basis, and each diagonal element has to be the same value or the expectation value of the eigenstates are different from each other. if you rotate the basis then your operator is still diagonal with the same value- this is to be expected from a totally degenerate eigenspace.

if the latter, then if an operator P commutes with the Hamiltonian then the expectation value ought to be unchanging with time. whatever that expectation value is, create a new operator as P-<P> which will have expectation value zero for all time.
 
I'm pretty sure that in general the only operator that could always be guarenteed to commute with any hamiltonian would be the hamiltonian itself or a constant, thus the only operators which have a constant mean value in time are the hamiltonian and some constant operator.
 
CPL.Luke said:
I'm pretty sure that in general the only operator that could always be guarenteed to commute with any hamiltonian would be the hamiltonian itself or a constant, thus the only operators which have a constant mean value in time are the hamiltonian and some constant operator.

I think that's true. You could build a function of the Hamiltonian I guess, and that would commute with the Hamiltonian. So a linear combination of Constant, H, H^2... H^n etc.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K