I How Can Tensors Be Evaluated to Scalars?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter LarryS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scalars Tensors
LarryS
Gold Member
Messages
357
Reaction score
33
Many descriptions of tensors define them to be these kind of multidimensional arrays of numbers, as generalizations of vectors and matrices, that transform in a certain way. But, mathematically, tensors are functions whose domains are these multidimensional arrays and whose codomains/ranges are the real numbers.

My question: Is there a general rule to evaluate any tensor, to determine the real number that is assigned to it? Perhaps by successive contractions, until it becomes a scalar?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No. You cannot represent any function as a single real number (unless the domain is a single point or the function is a constant). The number depends on the arguments.
 
LarryS said:
the real number that is assigned to it?
I am not sure what you mean by this. There is a real number assigned to ##T^{\mu\nu…}a_\mu b_\nu …## but there is no number assigned to ##T^{\mu\nu…}##
 
  • Like
Likes Jaime Rudas
Dale said:
I am not sure what you mean by this. There is a real number assigned to ##T^{\mu\nu…}a_\mu b_\nu …## but there is no number assigned to ##T^{\mu\nu…}##
I think I see where you are going. I probably need to read/study this subject a little further.
 
LarryS said:
Perhaps by successive contractions, until it becomes a scalar?
That is the only way to get a scalar from a tensor, yes: by contracting it, either with itself or with appropriate other tensors, so that there are no free indexes left and you have a scalar.

What are usually called the "components" of a tensor can be viewed as contractions of that tensor with appropriate combinations of basis vectors and covectors of a particular reference frame.
 
  • Like
Likes cianfa72, LarryS, Ibix and 1 other person
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
Back
Top