How can the change-base identity be used to prove this equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tahayassen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of the change-base identity in logarithmic equations, specifically in proving an equation involving logarithms. Participants are examining the relationship between different expressions and the implications of their evaluations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to evaluate both sides of the equation independently to establish equality. Some express confusion regarding the differences between various exponentiation rules and logarithmic identities.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing clarification regarding the evaluation of logarithmic expressions and the change-base identity. Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach the left-hand side of the equation, while others have shared their confusion about the steps involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that their school has specific requirements for proofs, which may influence their approach to evaluating the equation. There is also mention of a preference for using LaTeX for mathematical expressions, indicating a potential barrier for some in the discussion.

tahayassen
Messages
269
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



http://img843.imageshack.us/img843/3826/help3c.png

Homework Equations



Not applicable.

The Attempt at a Solution



http://img810.imageshack.us/img810/5577/help2n.png

Can anyone prove this by evaluating the left side and right side independent of each other?

http://img827.imageshack.us/img827/9757/helpdi.png

Can someone explain why this is incorrect? I'm so confused.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
tahayassen said:

Homework Statement



http://img843.imageshack.us/img843/3826/help3c.png

Homework Equations



Not applicable.

The Attempt at a Solution



http://img810.imageshack.us/img810/5577/help2n.png

Can anyone prove this by evaluating the left side and right side independent of each other?

http://img827.imageshack.us/img827/9757/helpdi.png

Can someone explain why this is incorrect? I'm so confused.

[tex]2^{3^4} = 2^{81} = 2417851639229258349412352, \mbox{ while } 2 \times 3 \times 4 = 24.[/tex] In fact, [tex]((x^a)^b)^c = x^{a b c},[/tex] as you have recognized, but that is _very_ different from [tex]x^{a^{b^c}},[/tex] which you are confused about. Look at the brackets: in [itex]((x^a)^b)^c[/itex] we first compute [itex]x^a,[/itex] then take the bth power of that, then take the cth power of the result. In x^[a^(b^c)] we first compute b^c, then raise a to that power, then raise x to the result.

RGV
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ray Vickson said:
[tex]2^{3^4} = 2^{81} = 2417851639229258349412352, \mbox{ while } 2 \times 3 \times 4 = 24.[/tex] In fact, [tex]((x^a)^b)^c = x^{a b c},[/tex] as you have recognized, but that is _very_ different from [tex]x^{a^{b^c}},[/tex] which you are confused about. Look at the brackets: in [itex]((x^a)^b)^c[/itex] we first compute [itex]x^a,[/itex] then take the bth power of that, then take the cth power of the result. In x^[a^(b^c)] we first compute b^c, then raise a to that power, then raise x to the result.

RGV

Interesting. Thanks for the clarification.

If anyone is wondering what I meant by evaluating each side independent of each other, I meant evaluating the left-hand side, and then evaluating the right-hand side, and then after they look exactly the same, you can conclude that the left-hand side equals the right-hand side. Unfortunately, this is the only way my school accepts proofs.
 
Operating only on the LHS: you first prove the relation to change base and then use that identity, vis:[tex]LHS=\log_{(a^b)}(c^d) = \frac{\log_a(c^d)}{\log_a(a^b)} = \frac{d\;\log_a(c)}{b}=RHS[/tex]...

(If you have already done the proof [change-base identity], i.e. in class, you can just refer to it; and if you haven't, you can look it up.)

Aside: it is probably worth your while learning LaTeX rather than posting images.
It helps us too since we can then copy and paste from your post to edit your equations.
 
Simon Bridge said:
Operating only on the LHS: you first prove the relation to change base and then use that identity, vis:[tex]LHS=\log_{(a^b)}(c^d) = \frac{\log_a(c^d)}{\log_a(a^b)} = \frac{d\;\log_a(c)}{b}=RHS[/tex]...

(If you have already done the proof [change-base identity], i.e. in class, you can just refer to it; and if you haven't, you can look it up.)

Aside: it is probably worth your while learning LaTeX rather than posting images.
It helps us too since we can then copy and paste from your post to edit your equations.

Thanks! That helped a ton! :)

@LaTeX: I looked at the tutorial, and it looked rather complicated... I've been using Daum Equation Editor (a chrome extension) and it has a beautiful interface. I'll learn LaTeX as soon as this semester is over though.

http://img860.imageshack.us/img860/1480/32446906.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
11K
Replies
34
Views
5K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K