How Can V Be Transformed into Different Algebraic Structures?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Dragonfall
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Turning
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores how the class of all sets in ZFC, denoted as V, can be transformed into various algebraic structures through different operations. Participants examine specific operations that yield structures such as groups and fields, considering both theoretical and practical implications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that symmetric difference can be used to turn V into a group.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of a forgetful functor and its left adjoint, explaining how it generates a free R-module from a set, thus creating an algebraic structure.
  • There are inquiries about how to transform V into a field, with one participant proposing the construction of real numbers via Dedekind cuts as a potential method.
  • Another participant reiterates the idea of using Dedekind cuts to construct fields, linking it to the construction of rational and natural numbers through sets.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the methods to transform V into various algebraic structures, with no consensus reached on the most effective approach or the validity of the proposed methods.

Contextual Notes

The discussion involves complex mathematical concepts that may depend on specific definitions and assumptions about sets and operations, which remain unresolved.

Dragonfall
Messages
1,023
Reaction score
5
What sort of operations can you pair up with V (class of all sets in ZFC) that turns it into various algebraic structures? For example, symmetric difference turns it into a group.

Now you must wave your hands a little since the algebraic structures are technically sets, and so are the functions, etc.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For instance, a forgetful functor [tex]U:R Mod \rightarrow Set[/tex] has a left adjoint F such that [tex]X \mapsto FX[/tex], which generates a free R-module using a basis set. So a free construction generates an algebraic structure using a set.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forgetful_functor" is the description from wiki,

"As this a fundamental example of adjoints, we spell it out: adjointness means that given a set X and an object (say, an R-module) M, maps of sets correspond to maps of modules : every map of sets yields a map of modules, and every map of modules comes from a map of sets."

[tex]Hom_{Mod R}(Free_{R}(X), M) = Hom_{Set}(X, Forget(M))[/tex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
How would you turn V into a field?
 
Dragonfall said:
How would you turn V into a field?

I think a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Construction_of_the_real_numbers" would do.

"A Dedekind cut in an ordered field is a partition of it, (A, B), such that A is nonempty and closed downwards, B is nonempty and closed upwards, and A contains no greatest element. Real numbers can be constructed as Dedekind cuts of rational numbers."

As you know, rational numbers can be constructed using integers and integers can be constructed using natural numbers that can be constructed using sets from constructivists' view. For above situations, the operators for algebraic structures can be converted into set operators.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
10K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K